Arrest AOC’s Grandmother Or Give Puerto Rico Independence

There was another hubbub concerning Puerto Rico’s most famous citizen, Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who represents a district in New York, not Puerto Rico. AOC as she is known, a former bartender, is most known for her Puerto Rican heritage and her constant complaints about how little welfare Puerto Rico receives and how terrible American colonialism is for the Puerto Rican people. The truth is that Puerto Ricans live off the hard work of White American taxpayers.

The specific complaint this time originates with a tweet from AOC that since Hurricane Maria in September 2017, her grandmother, abuela in Spanish, has not had her roof repaired. And former President Donald Trump is responsible for that particular failure of the disaster assistance agency, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), to get her roof repaired.

Compounding this was a tweet by Matt Walsh, who started a GoFundMe for AOC’s grandmother that raised over $100,000.00 for repairs.

The offer was rejected by the family, but Walsh has been dining out on the issue having got one over on AOC. Of course, Walsh, who has been saying the word White in public quite often, has also been exposed for failing to do the same fundraising for Whites suffering oppression from the Deep State.

However, AOC and Walsh’s little Twitter spat is not my main focus. More of interest is AOC’s adherence to a foreign entity in both the United States and New York, although that is of utmost importance and her lies about her grandmother.

First, let us look at AOC alienation from the Historic American Nation. While Puerto Ricans are, by legislation, American citizens, at no time have they been Americans in any sense of the word. They speak Spanish, not English, they don’t share a culture with the United States, theirs being one of mixed race mongrelization and Caribbean culture, not one of Whiteness, the English language, the heritage of the Western Civilization, the Revolutionary War, manifest destiny, settling the continent, and industrialization. Puerto Rico was part of none of that. It is a sad little colony obtained after the 1898 Spanish-American War. Puerto Rico has always had a strong independence movement which has only been thwarted by enormous welfare payments and free entry into the United States. AOC reflects that, despite her being born in the United States, she remains a Puerto Rican at heart and in her mongrel race, despite her ability to pass as White.

Despite living most of her live in the exurbs of New York, she considers herself a Puerto Rican and so is very concerned about what happens there, including how and if disaster assistance is provided to persons in Puerto Rico.

While Walsh thought he was owning the libs, he failed to think this through and has taken heat for raising money for leftists rather than for White Americans.

But what has been lost in all this was the lies that AOC was telling and the crimes she was covering up for her grandmother. First, AOC claimed that no money was getting to Puerto Rico and its residents because President Trump was holding up funds. That is a lie. Puerto Rico has been awash in regular disaster assistance funding and special funding appropriated by Congress. What AOC did not tell the public is that Puerto Rico is a black hole of fraud in all Federal programs, especially disaster assistance funding. Puerto Rico is so notorious for fraud, that the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General (DHS OIG), the agency charged with investigating fraud in FEMA’s disaster assistance programs has a full-time office in Puerto Rico just for disaster assistance fraud. No other State or possession of the United States has an office dedicated to just fraud in that one State or possession, not Guam, not Saipan, not the U.S. Virgin Islands, just Puerto Rico. Fraud is so notorious, that after each major disaster in Puerto Rico, the DHS OIG has to deploy large contingents of agents from all over the United States to deal with the massive fraud common after hurricanes and other disasters in Puerto Rico.

But back to AOC’s grandmother. Disaster assistance to residents and businesses in an area afflicted by a disaster is governed not by Presidential whim, but by law, in this case the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988, as amended. Generally, disaster assistance is divided into two areas, Individual Assistance (IA) and Public Assistance (PA). IA is for persons and businesses affected by the disaster and PA is for public agencies, mostly State and local governments, and non-profit agencies that are affected or who provide assistance in the relief of persons, rescue, medical assistance, and other actions common in disaster relief.

With regard to AOC’s grandmother, there is no manner at all to blame President Trump for any failure of her to have her roof repaired. First, Presidential involvement is for the most part limited to declaring the disaster, then FEMA takes over, working with, in this case, the Governor of Puerto Rico, to provide relief as authorized and regulated under the Stafford Act and Chapter 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Emergency Management And Assistance. It is an automated process; here’s the list of all disasters declared for Puerto Rico. They seem to have multiple disasters every year. What a shithole. In this case it was Puerto Rico Hurricane Maria, number EM-3391-PR, declared by President Trump on September 17, 2017.

FEMA provides IA to persons who have had damage to their residence and to personal property. However, if the residence is a rental or lease, damage to the property is the responsibility of the owner or landlord. Landlords, being commercial entities, do not get FEMA assistance, but no-interest loans from the Small Business Administration (SBA) to repair damage from a disaster to rental property.

After a declaration by the President, FEMA implements an online, phone bank, and in-person system for requesting disaster relief and adjudicating applications by both IA and PA applicants. Now, the fraud in both IA and PR is massive, with corrupt local officials heavily inclined to defraud the gringo and his money.

Now, with respect to AOC’s grandmother, there are only a limited number of reasons that she has not received money to repair her roof. First, and most obvious, she never applied. Puerto Ricans are low IQ and old people are especially affected by declining intelligence. Perhaps she never applied. AOC for all her public presentation as a Puerto Rican, doesn’t spend much time there. Outside of the tourist areas such as the beaches and Old San Juan, it is a proverbial shithole. That is why so many leave. And since aside from her public persona as a concerned Puerto Rican, AOC likely never determined in her grandmother ever applied.

Now, the application process can be confusing, and FEMA endlessly mails applicants letters and determinations, which can confuse low intelligence people, but most of the work is perfunctory, with 99% of applications approved. The only real hitch is the actual physical inspection, but often times that is waived. However, FEMA provides free consultation and assistance with applications by phone and in person at locally established Disaster Recovery Centers, outlying smaller offices, and through local governments. So, if AOC’s grandmother applied, but did not get her disaster assistance grant, then AOC or some other family member could have made a phone call or went in person to find out why there was no award of money to repair her roof.

The other, more likely reason, is that AOC’s grandmother applied for and obtained disaster assistance, but did not spend it on roof repairs. The Act and 44 CFR require that disaster assistance be spent on repair and replacement of damaged real property and personal property. What needs to be determined is what AOC’s grandmother spent her FEMA check on. It is clearly not on fixing her roof.

Now, if AOC’s grandmother did not own the property, the landlord is responsible for repairs. And certainly the landlord applied for and received an SBA no-interest loan to make the repairs. If the landlord did not, then it is not a case of missing disaster funds, but one of a contractual relationship between tenant and landlord justiciable under Puerto Rican local laws. But not related to President Trump or disaster assistance programs.

We all know the stories from Hurricane Katrina where FEMA gave out debit cards with thousands of dollars per claimant with no verification of any damage or loss by the claimants. We know from records that those debit cards were used not for evacuation, repair, or replacement, but used at strip clubs and for drugs. You humble reporter was involved in those investigations, and the fraud during Katrina was massive. Millions of dollars was lost to fraud then, and if AOC’s grandmother got money, she spent it on something else besides fixing her roof. Perhaps a family member stole it and spent it on cocaine. There are a number of scenarios, to many to address here. But one thing is certain. Disaster assistance was available to AOC’s grandmother, President Trump did not interfere with her check, and we know that she did not fix her roof. If she misused her disaster assistance, then AOC’s grandmother is criminally liable for fraud and should be investigated and indicted for making a false and fictitious claim to the United States in violation of Title 18 United States Code Section 287, False Claim.

But the real problem is Puerto Rico. It is not in any measure part of the Historic American Nation. It needs to be cut adrift and given its independence. AOC and her grandmother are not American in any sense of the word other than a mere legality and presence. AOC hates American and considers herself to be Puerto Rican, first, last, and always. America is only a passport of convenience for AOC, neither her heart or mind are American. It is time and just for AOC and other Puerto Ricans to return to Puerto Rico and live their lives there. They already have their own Olympic team. Let them have their national independence, and pay for their own disaster assistance. Puerto Rico Libre! Of course though, they won’t have Donald J. Trump to kick around any more.

Deadly Force And Double Standards

The shooting, and murder, of Ashli Babbitt by an unnamed U.S. Capitol Police officer, who has been identified as black, has become a cause celebre and rightly so. Babbitt was murdered and there is no doubt, well, at least not according to the current standards regarding the use of deadly force by law enforcement, and especially regarding the use of deadly force in riot or demonstration control. Quite correctly, the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the District of Colombia Metropolitan Police Department’s (MPD) Internal Affairs Division (IAD), will not release their reports, and it is reports, as it is multiple reports as the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, the miss named DOJ Civil Rights Division (CRD), and the MPD IAD should have separate reports.

Now, I have been the assigned case agent for multiple officer involved shooting incidents and have obtained criminal convictions against multiple Federal law enforcement officers in such cases, which included civil rights violations, and I have cleared other officers in shooting incidents, determining that such incidents were within agency policy, law, and constitutional standards.

Ashli Babbitt, Double Victim of Black Crime And The CRD War On Whites

First, and most obviously, the more publicity around a case, the more likely that any criminal prosecutions are politically motivated. The primary political motivation is anti-White racism directed against White law enforcement officers or White presenting Hispanics, to wit Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean, who were two Border Patrol Agents who shot a Mexican drug smuggler, by the CRD. The CRD is notorious for hatred of law enforcement officers and routinely tries to railroad officers involved in shootings. Generally CRD reserves its attacks on State and local law enforcement, as well as Border Patrol Agents (BPA). Otherwise CRD allows Federal agents to shoot anyone they want, especially FBI agents. The evidence obviously is Ruby Ridge and Waco where despite the deaths of hundreds of Americans, mostly White, there was no CRD investigation, much less FBI, DOJ Office of Inspector General, or Department of Treasury (DOT) OIG. For the uninitiated, the respective OIGs investigate shootings by Federal law enforcement officers, but in the case of Ruby Ridge and Waco where DOJ and DOT agencies were involved, there was no investigation. OIGs have statutory responsibility for such investigations, but DOJ OIG is especially toothless when investigating the FBI, but obviously more aggressive investigating less powerful agencies, such as the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). And everyone knew that the DOT OIG was hands off of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, Explosives, and Really Big Fires (ATF), then under the DOT. CRD has such a hard on for BPAs, that it tried Lonnie Schwartz three times for the same crime. It is unheard of for the DOJ to try a person three times after acquittals and hung juries. It is only because he was White and a Border Patrol Agent that happened. Furthermore, to show you the character of CRD Trial Attorneys, one told me during a trial he worked in CRD only because he hated cops. That really means though that he hates White people, because in the arena of criminal prosecutions, that is generally the only Whites you come across in the criminal justice system.

This is the background of the DOJ, and specifically the CRD. Of course, the FBI hates Whites as well and nothing makes them happier than getting a case where a black “cop” shoots a White person. In such cases, especially if it involves a Federal officer shooting a White, the CRD and FBI suddenly become the Blue Wall of Silence, and especially so in the case of Ashli Babbitt.

First, while we have a statement from the DOJ on the investigation, we don’t have any of the reports, which is unprecedented. Such reports, as they show the end of a criminal case, are and should be publicly available, and not have to be requested under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Generally such reports are released to the public when charges are not brought, as in the case of Darren Wilson, the police officer who shot the criminal Michael Brown. Now, you will say that Wilson was not charged. Correct, but the DOJ, FBI, and CRD tried their best to railroad Wilson, but did not have the evidence. And, at that time, they were unwilling to use perjured testimony to indict and try Wilson. That, however, has changed since the Derek Chauvin case where perjury was on display for all to see from prosecution witnesses. And note that two of the prosecutors were brought in as volunteers from the DOJ.

But, back to Ashli Babbitt. A case has been closed without any public report. That is strange in itself and obviously there is something to hide. And it is that the evidence was clear that the shooter was not justified under the training, policy, law, and constitutional standards, but the DOJ and CRD just lied to the public as part of their campaign against White Americans.

The most interesting part of this case is that the coverup of the murder of Ashli Babbitt is a throw back to the good-old days that modern civil rights activists in general condemned about police shootings, especially those of blacks, and for which the CRD was created to investigate. In the old days, investigations of police shootings were perfunctory. Well, not just the good-old days, the same standard of the good-old days applies today to killers like FBI sniper Ron Horiuchi. In the old days, there would usually never be an investigation, criminal or administrative, or any investigation would be perfunctory. Now, in most cases, the shootings were justified, as most of those shot were well deserving black criminals or other criminal scum. It evolved later to local prosecutors going though an investigation and presenting a case to a grand jury, but the fix was in as the presentation to the grand jury was designed to exonerate the officer. I knew a Los Angeles County Deputy Sheriff who was no-billed by a grand jury twice regarding on-duty shootings. He said it was the best feeling in his life. Of course, both shootings were really justified, but it is clear that most District Attorney’s had no interest in prosecuting local cops, especially from large agencies like the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) for example, as a District Attorney is only as good as the officers and detectives who bring in cases. DAs get elected by prosecuting criminals, not cops. Police unions are important endorsements in such elections and prosecuting cops, either justly or unjustly, is not a good move. Now, that problem is why CRD was created. The theory was that these high flying graduates of Ivy League law schools would swoop in and uphold the standard of justice for all in the teeth of local refusal to prosecute bad and brutal cops.

The Black Hand That Murdered Ashli Babbitt

Of course, the reality is different. CRD is filled with America and White hating Jews and immigrants who especially hate White cops and want to make a name by finding the Great White Defendant (GWD). Why else do you think that CRD is doing double jeopardy on Derek Chauvin and in the case of Ahmaud Arbery shooting defendants Greg McMichael, his adult son Travis McMichael, and neighbor William “Roddie” Bryan? The CRD just hates Whites. Why else would they indict two Whites for driving past a black person with a Confederate flag?

But, back to Ashli Babbitt. It is just like the old days. Prosecuting cops is just hard, too hard, so no charges.

The Justice Department does not bring criminal charges in most police shootings it investigates in part because of the high burden for prosecution. Criminal charges were not expected in this case because videos of the shooting show Babbitt encroaching into a prohibited space, and second-guessing the actions of an officer during the violent and chaotic day would have been a challenge.

‘Specifically, the investigation revealed no evidence to establish that, at the time the officer fired a single shot at Ms. Babbitt, the officer did not reasonably believe that it was necessary to do so in self-defense or in defense of the Members of Congress and others evacuating the House Chamber,’ prosecutors said.

DOJ Won’t Pursue Charges Against Capitol Cop Who Shot Ashli Babbitt, by Valerie Edwards, Daily Mail/AP/MSN, April 14, 2021

Now, let’s go to the standard for use of deadly force by law enforcement officers and pay attention to training standards across the Federal government. First, there is the Constitutional standard. A law enforcement officer may only use deadly force under very specific conditions, which are that there is a threat of death or great bodily injury to the officer or another person. There are a couple of other official standards, such as fleeing with important national security secrets or theft of especially dangerous weapons, but those are limited and don’t apply to this case. The standard was established by the Supreme Court in the case of Tennessee v. Garner where the court established the threat of death or great bodily injury involving the shooting of a fleeing burglary suspect. The standard now for use of force is that the person being shot must be an imminent threat of death or great bodily injury to the officer using force. In the case of Ashli Babbitt, the underlying reason for the shooting is that she was entering into a government building through a broken window. She had no weapons, visible or otherwise, and this was during a public protest.

Now, technically, anyone involved in a riot and attacking police officers can be a deadly force situation. Review any video of the 2017 Inauguration Day demonstration or the 2020 attacks on the White House by Antifa and BLM terrorists, one can see many situations where deadly force was justified, more justified than entering through a broken window. Note that Babbitt did not break the window, she just entered through the broken window. If there was a riot, shooting rioters is technically justified, as even an unarmed group of rioters is a deadly threat to an individual officer or small groups of officers depending on the number of rioters. However, in practice, shooting rioters is not allowed. The last time rioters where shot on any scale was the Rodney King riots in Los Angeles. Praise to Rooftop Koreans, BPAs, LAPD, and the U.S. Marines. And we all know that Federal and National Guard troops shot rioters in the 1960s riots, but the last time was 1992. Whether it was the Ferguson riots, or the BLM riots of 2020, no one was shot, at least not by cops.

But, you may say, if someone is breaking into your home, you can shoot that person. Yes, of course, in most States, but not in the United Kingdom. Most States allow the occupants of a residence to use deadly force during a home invasion without any evidence of a threat based on the legal assumption that anyone breaking into a residence is intent on causing death or great bodily harm. Hell, in Texas you can freely shot someone breaking into your unoccupied car, but that are State laws or practices. In Ashli Babbitt’s case, Garner applied. And the Garner standards for use of deadly force clearly showed that there was no imminent threat of death or great bodily injury from a woman, in daylight, entering a Federal building through a broken window. In such cases lower levels of force are required. In such case use of commands, hands on the suspect, use of punches and kicks if the person resists, Mace, pepper spray, pepper balls, baton rounds, bean bag rounds, and Tasers make up the continuum of force that can be used. Shooting someone coming through a window, unless armed with a firearm, is not allowed under Garner.

Note that the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office and the Federal Courthouse in Portland have been under armed assault by Antifa and BLM terrorists armed with blinding lasers, rocks, bottles, concrete filled cans, and fire bombs, but no one has been shot at during those attacks.

Most telling though is that only one officer fired at any of the demonstrators during the protest at the Capitol. While an unofficial indicator, it’s telling. When investigating officer involved shootings, if there are multiple officers who are involved, generally if it is justifiable, then most of the offices at the scene shoot. If only one does, that suggests that the shooting may be questionable. Generally, if one officer shoots, all shoot, as all or most see the same deadly force threat. Now there are exceptions, officers who don’t have the same view of a weapon or out of crossfire concerns, but frequently when one officer shoots, others do, even if they are depending, correctly or incorrectly, on another officer’s view of a threat. It is common for officers to shoot even when one officer does not see the threat, and they are relying on the judgement of another officer who is shooting. That is not the best way to decide to use deadly force, but it happens. Some experts even suggest that is part of human nature, once one human in your group reacts to a threat, the others react even if they are uncertain of the threat. Part of our genetic inheritance from humans who lived in dangerous times millennia ago when nature was sharp of tooth and claw. But it is absolutely telling that no other offices shot. I’ll bet that there were some immediate comments that condemned this officer. Basically, “what the fuck did you just do?” or words to that effect. And I am certain that the CRD or the other officers who were witnesses suppressed that evidence. Likely is that the CRD is using the Blue Wall Of Silence to protect this black officer all in the name of the current War On Whites.

Affirmative Action Killer Of Ashli Babbitt?

Nor is it allowed under the training that the unnamed officer received while at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLECT), Glynco, GA, where most Federal law enforcement officers are trained. At FLETC, our black shooter was giving extensive training on use of deadly force. Here is an example lesson. During my 28 year career in Federal law enforcement, in both uniformed and plainclothes positions, the training regarding the use of deadly force takes up a significant part of training. It is emphasized and re-emphasized. I have investigated officers and agents for misuse of force, and it all comes back to this training. Some, frankly, are just stupid and cannot handle the pressure of a deadly force situation and I will bet that this black officer was one of those. The U.S. Capitol Police has lots of low intelligence employees. It is not a real police department as they don’t do much street law enforcement work. They are mostly security guards with arrest authority. Consequently they are one of the least prestigious agencies and have little either practice or experience in deadly force scenarios or even arrests, other than the typical protestor who disrupts a Congressional hearing. Because the Capitol Police are low speed, high drag, they don’t attract the best and the brightest. Add in affirmative action and shooting a woman entering a window is what you get.

And I will bet that this officer did not have his background and internet history examined, as the protestors did, as Derek Chauvin did, etc. Does he have an history of visiting black oriented racial supremacist websites? Has he ever been to a Louis Farrakhan sermon or mosque? Is he a BLM advocate? We don’t know, and the CRD and FBI likely made no effort to find out. Any and all Whites accused of any crime against a minority get the microscopic examination of their racial and political views as evidence of a hate crime. But Ashli Babbitt’s shooter did not. That is because Whites are second class citizens. It is a War On Whites, and Babbitt is just the latest victim.

The Jewish Purge Of Patriots At DHS Begins

On April 26, 2021, the Jewish Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Alejandro Mayorkas, he of the Get To Yes fraud at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) when he was the Director there, announced that he was beginning a purge of DHS employees who he considered to be domestic violent extremists. And if you thought that was Black Lives Matter (BLM) or Antifa terrorists, you would be wrong. Obviously the primary target is White patriots in the bureaucracy, but anyone who adheres to his or her Oath of Office as a DHS employee to see that the laws of the United States are faithfully executed encapsulated in Title 5 United States Code, Section 3331, Oath Of Office, is also a target. White presenting Hispanics who voted for Donald Trump and who recently voted in special Texas border elections overwhelmingly for Republican candidates, are also targets. Much of DHS is Hispanic, especially in the Border Patrol and manning the Ports-of-Entry at U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and they will be targets as well as they are all in for immigration enforcement.

An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law.

[Oath Of Office, unattributed, LII, undated]

Also in his warning message to White and affiliated White presenting Hispanics, was a curious claim that DHS has a role in the fictional January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. Now, DHS has no role in the enforcement of any of the laws being used against the innocent protestors at the U.S. Capitol who were concerned about the theft of the 2020 Presidential election. DHS’ law enforcement authority is almost exclusively concerning only two areas, immigration law enforcement and customs law enforcement.

And there, as the poet said, lies the rub. Mayorkas does not want to enforce the immigration laws of the United States, in contravention of his Oath Of Office. As part of his effort to subvert immigration enforcement, his plan is to purge DHS of any employee who enforces immigration law using the excuse of “extremism.” The Obama Regime had a similar, but more widely targeted plan to investigate and harass Americans, mostly White, but also White presenting Hispanics, who wanted immigration laws enforced, opposed Muslim terrorism, and owned firearms. The Obama Regime used DHS Fusion Centers to illegally target and calumnize patriotic White Americans. Instead of arresting and deporting illegal aliens, Mayorkas’ plan is to waste department resources pursuing anyone who objects to his lawless Biden Regime Administrative Amnesty.

See below the email from Mayorkas to all employees. The threat is clear, any opponent to the illegality of the Biden Regime will be purged and punished.

Page 1 of Mayorkas’ Threat Letter
Page 2 of Mayrokas’ Threat Letter
Page 3 of Mayorkas’ Threat Letter
Angry Tyrant Alejandro Mayorkas

Sadly the RINOs in the Senate nearly unanimously voted to confirm Mayorkas despite his history of corruption and none are taking action regarding the illegal amnesty he is running for illegal aliens.

Stay tuned for more in the coming days. It will get bad. Fortunately, DHS employee unions are strong and may cause some problems for Mayorkas.

Did Modern Touchy Feely Policing Get Fentanyl Floyd Killed?

The big thing in modern policing today is de-escalation. This is the unproved supposition that the mere presence of the police is an escalation leading to bodies of color being violated and the provision that when making an arrest police officers should seek to calm tensions and negotiate with criminals in an effort to effect a peaceful arrest.

A fine theory, nice guy cop just talks a criminal into being arrested. Sadly, it does not work in reality. But because of this nonsense, Derek Chauvin is on trial for his life. George Floyd is also dead because of this useless and, more accurately, counterproductive nonsense created by anti-police groups as part of their efforts to end arrests of black and brown bodies.

In the old days, meaning the 70s, 80s, and before, anyone resisting arrest was met with overwhelming and often brutal force. I remember one story from an older colleague in an unnamed Federal agency from his days a Los Angeles County Deputy Sheriff. One night while on solo patrol he pulled over a drunk driver who decided he was not going to jail. For the record, the driver was White. Well, that started a serious fight that my former colleague was losing, badly. Fortunately, he had radioed in a call for assistance and two CHiPs, California Highway Patrol, showed up. They commenced to treat the drunk driver like a king, Rodney King. And, well, that was that. Drunk driver was then unceremoniously handcuffed and my still slightly dazed former colleague was left with a badly beaten suspect and the two CHiPs had left the scene, undoubtedly not wanting to write any reports. Not that that would have been much of a problem, as my former colleague skated by with a warning about not going overboard on suspects. Now, it was obvious that the CHiPs could have been identified, but only by an investigation from an outside agency, as all the CHiPs on duty would have denied anything if asked, but in any event, the LASO would not have had the temerity to inquire with the CHP, and the khaki wall of silence from those Traffic Officers, CHiPs were Traffic Officers back then, not Peace Officers, on up the ranks, especially concerning the shift sergeant, with whom any investigation by the CHP would have stopped. It was more than likely that the shift Sergeant that night with the CHP knew who did it, just by whose patrol areas were closest to the incident, but more likely by the wonderful stories told by the two CHiPs about how they saved the bacon of that Deputy. While my former colleague was discreet enough to not admit it, he likely knew who the two were, at least later, as word gets around in such a community as law enforcement, especially in 1970s Los Angeles, even more so if one agency gets something over the another agency. Likely this story circulated at cop bars and barbeques about how X and Y saved Z’s butt over a mere drunk driving suspect.

And all for good in the end. The drunk driver survived, more importantly he learned an important lesson, and everyone went home that night, attesting to the theme of early 80s cop show, Hill Street Blues, “Let’s be careful out there,” meaning don’t get killed, but bring in the bad guys, by hook or by crook, and if crook, don’t get caught.

But now back to our hero, Derek Chauvin and delusion of de-escalation. While one may object to being treated like a King, that is usually the best way to go. I was trained in the bad old days, though not like the CHP in the early 70s. We, at least, went through the motions of not giving someone a beatdown, but nor were we ever told not to use overwhelming force to effect an arrest. By the 1990s, it was a wink-and-a-nudge, then get on with the business of using that baton, but always say “Stop Resisting” while doing so. More importantly, we did not negotiate an arrest, that was for the SWAT team negotiator dealing with crazy trannies. We were specifically trained to use overwhelming and immediate force on anyone to be arrested or who resisted arrest. Suspects got one warning, “You’re under arrest.” After that, any failure to comply was game on.

Now, however, cops are continually negotiating and warning violent and dangerous armed criminals that if they don’t submit, they will be arrested or pepper sprayed or tased or bean bagged or shot. The end is that the police spend more time telling criminals what may happen, nothing happens as the cops keep repeating the same, then criminals don’t believe anything the cops say, as they aren’t being handcuffed, pepper sprayed, tased, beanbagged, or shot. Consequently, the criminal thinks he can negotiate, escape, run, resist, or shoot back as none of the promised consequences happened. This is because attempts at de-escalation do not work, especially for low IQ criminals with black and brown bodies.

One can see endless examples of this on video. Every situation from the sovereign citizen types who think they can spew legal mumbo jumbo and the cops will leave and not bust their window out and take said citizen to jail, to armed criminals who are told to drop it endlessly, then get shot, all the meantime not shooting the armed criminal first and right after he or she refuses the first command to drop it ends up either shot or endangering the public by running all around town before one cop decides enough is enough.

Two examples here, one a Moorish American who thinks the cops don’t have the ball to bust his window as they are endlessly telling him they will bust out the window, are endlessly giving him one last chance, and the Sov Cit thinks he’s getting away with it. The second being an armed invader of color with a brown body waving knives and hammers around, parading around Los Angeles being told to drop it, but he doesn’t believe it because the cops are just talking, not doing. Instead of sudden and overwhelming force, it is tiptoeing up to the line of force, talking, endangering the public, then doing what should have been done a half an hour ago.

Now, how is this related to Fentanyl Floyd and our hero Derek Chauvin? Recent testimony has shown that instead of cuffing and stuffing Fentanyl Floyd, Chauvin and the other cops spent a seemingly endless amount of time negotiating with a drugged up criminal who then died because if he had been immediately immobilized, i.e. hogtied, and lain out in the back seat of the police cruiser, then forthwith to the booking facility, his later medical collapse because of his drug use could have been treatable, as jails have immediately available medical personnel.

Even worse, the prosecution basically admitted that Chauvin and other officers could have legally tased Fentanyl Floyd, likely ending the whole show before the crowd showed up to make their misleading video that led to all this nonsense.

But then Nelson scored huge when he dug into the specific knowledge that Chauvin brought with him to the scene, and in particular what level of force that knowledge would have privileged Chauvin to use against Floyd.

Chauvin had heard a priority 1 call, knew force was being used, heard scuffling over the radio, knew other officers were engaged in a fight, was called as backup to support them, knew the suspect was possible impaired, and 6 ½ feet tall, and when he arrived he saw Floyd and twow officers at the back of the squad car, with the Floyd actively resisting their lawful efforts to place him in the squid car. Agreed?

Agreed, said Stiger.

Under your analysis of the MPD use-of-force continuum and policies, is it true that Chauvin would have been privileged to simply draw his Taser and use it on Floyd, to stop Floyd’s active resistance.

Yes, answered Stiger.

Nelson: But he didn’t do that.

Stiger: No, he did not.

Lesson for the jury: Chauvin not only didn’t use excessive force throughout his encounter with Floyd, he didn’t even use as much force as MPD policy allowed for. Instead, he used less force.

Chauvin Trial Day 8 Wrap-Up: “I Ate Too Many Drugs” Video May Be Game-Changer, by Andrew Branca, Legal Insurrection, April 7, 2021

There we have it, even the prosecution’s use-of-force expert says that a judicious application of a taser would have been legal, and likely would have ended this all sooner.

Thanks to Chauvin having a skilled cross-examiner as an attorney, we now know that criminals in general, and Floyd in particular, were using the mandatory de-escalation techniques against the police, as, again, testified to by the prosecution’s witness.

And that’s precisely what happened with Mercil, and in a big, big way.

Nelson began by asking questions related to Mercil’s time as a street cop, with a particular emphasis on the tendency of suspects being subject to arrest to come up with all kinds of nonsense about why they shouldn’t be arrested that day.

Dangerous job, being a police officer? Yes. Are people generally unhappy about being arrested? Very rarely are they happy, Mercil answered. Do suspects frequently engage in a wide variety of behaviors to avoid arrest, including fighting, arguing, making excuses? Yes, they do, answered Mercil.

Indeed, when asked if he himself had ever disbelieved a suspect’s claim of a medical emergency as an apparent effort to avoid arrest, Mercil answered that he personally had done so.

All of this, of course, undercuts the part of the prosecution narrative that is relying on Floyd’s purported pleas and excuses about claustrophobia and anxiety and crying out for mama. Perhaps all of that is real—but a reasonable officer must also consider that maybe much of it is simply an effort to avoid arrest.

Chauvin Trial Day 7 Wrap-Up: A Horrible Day For The Prosecution, by Andrew Branca, Legal Insurrection, April 6, 2021

So, there it is, de-escalation killed George Floyd, well, that and a lot of meth and fentanyl. Also a large and violent crowd, who if they had not been there, the paramedics would have treated instead of a “load and scoot.”

Any public policy may have unintended consequences. De-escalation is one of them. It sounds nice, but in the real world it does not play out that way. George Floyd may be dead because of ill-designed and ill-intentioned “de-escalation” policies. Like pulling off a bandage, better to do it quick, than slow. But perhaps the radical left knew this. They don’t care. They got their riots and Joe Biden’s election because of this situation. Expect more. Nothing succeeds like policy failure.

Who Is Responsible For The Atlanta Shooting At Chinese Brothels?

Robert Aaron Long is not responsible for the shooting of numerous mostly Chinese prostitutes. Mass immigration designed to destroy the Historic American Nation is. But who allowed this, not in the long term sense, but the responsible officials with the power and authority to do something? Long was a victim of the pornography industry, mostly Jewish, which deliberately targets men for financial gain and long-term political interests, as well as the mostly Chinese prostitution industry. Long was targeted by greed pornographers and prostitutes, addicted to sex by deliberate manipulation, just as Facebook and Twitter addict people to upcummies with their software. While there is not much the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) can do about pornography, well, at least not that made in the United States, though there are laws on the books that make interstate transportation of pornography a Federal offense, which itself hinges on some vague “community standard.” DHS does have the strong hand on prostitution in the United States. Some time ago I detailed how internet prostitution, mostly fueled by Asian immigrants, legal and illegal, grew under Bill Clinton and prospered under Jorge Bush, but was later shutdown by Barack Hussein Obama of all people. [Instead of Raids, Sweeps, and Checkpoints, We Get Fake Human Trafficking, by Federale, Federale Fifth Columnist, February 6, 2020]

However, the world’s oldest profession did not go away, it left the internet, except for flooding otherwise “legitimate” dating sites, for In Real Life (IRL), which is amazing in itself. The press, including Alt-Right sites, keeps referring to these “rub-and-tug” joints as “Asian” massage parlors, but are nothing more than brothels, and Chinese, not Asian, at that. While brothel review sites and advertisers wax poetic about the diversity of their prostitutes, usually referring to them as Thai, Asian, Japanese, or Korean, the predominate nationality of working girls is Chinese. Why, because the Chinese are greedy and have no honor since the Revolution. Sex to the Chinese is just a commodity, reinforced by the various Maoist campaigns against Confucianism and Christianity, but fundamentally a problem caused by a lack of Christianity. Like their compatriots in the porn industry, prostitution does not have the same public opprobrium in China as it does in the West. And China is poor, desperately poor, even more so today despite the nukes and skyscrapers. And one way out of poverty for Chinese women is coming to America to either work as a prostitute or as a madam.

This is not to say that other Asian nationalities are absent from the brothels. Vietnamese represent another significant percentage of owners and workers in the industry, centered around so-called massage parlors. The interesting fact is that those are not illegal aliens like the Chinese, but legal residents, naturalized American citizens, and native born Americans of Vietnamese ethnicities.

But back to the Chinese angle. For the Chinese, massage parlors are just another business venture that they participate in, be it restaurants, corner markets, dry-cleaning, etc. The Chinese have a system for these things, and entrepreneurial spirit you can say and massage parlors are just another business, but one that depends on a steady supply of illegal aliens, and many legal aliens as well. In fact, despite sections against the entry of prostitutes in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended, subsequent legislation, such as the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 and subsequent reauthorization legislation effectively created a pipeline of so-called victims brought to the United States for prostitution, who then subsequently are rescued, then return to the business, well, because working on your back is easier than the 9-5 grind, and you get paid in cash and don’t pay taxes.

In fact, DHS spends more time and money “protecting” so-called “victims” of trafficking that on enforcing immigration law against the perpetrators and co-conspirators. The scheme goes like this. Chinese actor in America recruits young women in China, promises decent pay and living conditions in exchange for sex work. The girls also travel among different locations throughout the United States, many times working for different madams or other places owned by their madam. And it is almost always a madam, a mama-san. The girls learn the trade. If they get arrested, they then claim to have been trafficked, are awarded with a green card under the T-Visa system, basically a form of asylum for prostitutes, and, importantly, a self-supporting system, constantly being filled with new “victims” who are rewarded for their decision to become prostitutes. Those “victims” then tell their friends and associates back home how the system works, with little or no chance of being prosecuted or deported. The goal then of the “victims” is to join the victimizer, to become a madam, have her own business, and recruiting from a never ending pool of willing “victims” in China, a nation with 500 million poor women looking for an out.

But back to our real victim, Robert Long. Who enabled this system of fraud based on illegal immigration? Why our beloved ICE SVU (ICE Special Victims Unit), also known as Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the nest of Customs pukes who took over and ended immigration enforcement in the interior of the United States under Jorge Bush. And who in ICE SVU office allowed metro Atlanta to be overrun with Chinese prostitutes? The responsible official is the Special Agent-in-Charge (SAC) of the Atlanta office. That official is supposed to enforce immigration law in the interior of the United States, in this case Atlanta itself, Georgia, and a few neighboring states. Now since 2003, there have been numerous ICE SVU SACs, but we’ll look at three of the most recent, on who’s watch Chinese brothels expanded and prospered without interference. And two of co-conspirators against Robert Long were part of the Dirty 19, who publicly attack President Trump for daring to enforce immigration law in the United States. [ICE SVU Insubordinate Leadership Attacks Trump, by Federale, VDare, June 29, 2018]

The first, and most responsible, is Customs puke Brock Nicholson, long-time ICE SVU Atlanta manager, over the years holding both the Deputy SAC and SAC positions since June 2006. Under his “leadership” immigration enforcement ended, Chinese illegals thrived, and we end up with mass murder.

Brock Nicolson, Legacy Customs Puke

Next is affirmative action hire and prominent member of the Dirty 19 Nick S. Annan. Annan followed up Nicholson and is a legacy Customs Special Agent.

Nick Annan, Affirmative Action Hire

What did Annan do to reverse the failure of his predecessor to enforce immigration law and strike at rampant prostitution in the Atlanta area? Absolutely nothing. ICE SVU was just a hostile takeover of the legacy INS by Customs pukes only concerned about protection the National Football League T-shirt sales.

Next up, with last chance to save lives and help poor Robert Long with his sex addiction problem was another notorious member of the Dirty 19, Katrina Berger. Berger is infamous for protecting illegal aliens from deportation even after they were arrested. Berger did nothing about Chinese prostitution in Atlanta, and she was the last chance to save the lives of those prostitutes and to help Long with his addiction. Berger is very enthusiastic about doing drug investigations, generally the responsibility of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), but she did not care to enforce laws relating to immigration that could have saved lives. Enough of ICE SVU poaching the work of other law enforcement agencies just to avoid arresting Chinese prostitutes.

Dirty 19 Co-conspirator Katrina Berger

Sadly, the Trump Administration was behind both Berger’s and Annan’s promotions and failed to require them to do their jobs and save lives by ending the Chinese prostitute invasion. Personnel is policy and Trump failed here. Likely because Ivanka Trump had to have her little cause of trafficking “victims.” Should we have a second round of Trump after this?

The Biden Regime Administrative Amnesty, America Will Get It, Good And Hard

What is old is new again. After four year interregnum of a Trumpian failure of haphazard enforcement of immigration law, fits and start at enforcement, failure to contain and discipline the immigration bureaucracy, almost a 1,000 miles of fencing, and a legal immigration near shutdown, between to Regimes of nation busters, what I first wrote about in my since censored blog ( and in my debut [Will A GOP Congress Block Obama’s Ongoing Administrative Amnesty?, by Federale, VDare, October 31, 2010] has returned, but in spades. Was the first Administrative Amnesty just 12 or so years ago? The Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty has since become the Biden Regime Administrative Amnesty. While many have noted that a legislative amnesty is DOA on Capital Hill [Biden’s Great Replacement Acceleration Act May Be DOA, But GOP Needs A Leader To Defend The Historic American Nation, by Washington Watcher II, VDare, February 21, 2021] , the real amnesty, the administrative amnesty that will become the basis for the kritarchy establishing its own amnesty, is in force. Note as well that it is your humble correspondent that brought you the terms kritarch and kritarchy to describe the current usurpation of our once republican form of government by the Deep State judiciary. The earliest I can find referencing kritarch is 2014, but I am certain I had some earlier references. [Iranian-American Immigration Judge Ashley Tabaddor In Hot Water Ordered To Recuse Herself On Iranian Cases, Files “Civil Rights” Beef, by Federale, VDare, August 17, 2014] Benjamin Franklin is rolling in his grave, as the Republic is dead, replaced with an administrative dictatorship enforced by an unaccountable and hostile Deep State, as Tucker Carlson has found out.

And the Biden Regime, filled with Jewish Deep Staters, is not shy about its plan, flood the nation with non-White immigrants in order to elect a new people. VDare has detailed the obvious aid that the Biden Regime has given to illegal aliens; deportation ban, arrest ban, ending detention, welcome centers, etc. But the worst is yet to come. The most corrupt DHS Secretary, Get-To-Yes Mayorkas, has decided that the spouses and children of illegal aliens in the United States will be reunited, not by deportation, but by those relatives of illegals outside the United States being admitted into the United States and those intending to seek asylum will also admitted into the United States in a sort of granting of “pre-asylum” status. Now, technically, these will not be “admissions” as that has certain legal requirements, i.e. an alien is inspected by an immigration officer and let into the United States in a lawful status. Those two groups above will not be “admitted” in an immigration status, but “paroled” into the United States to then file an asylum claim.

President Joe Biden’s border chief announced his plans Tuesday to expand economic migration into the United States, on top of the roughly one million people per year set by Congress.

“For years, the asylum system has been badly in need of reengineering,” said the March 16 statement by DHS secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. He continued:

In addition to improving the process by which unaccompanied children are placed with family or sponsors, we will be issuing a new regulation shortly and taking other measures to implement the long-needed systemic reforms. We will shorten from years to months the time it takes to adjudicate an asylum claim while ensuring procedural safeguards and enhancing access to counsel…

Mayorkas is also using the 2008 law to expand the inflow of younger migrants, including many who take low-wage, high-abuse jobs in the United States to pay off their trafficking debts. For example, he has opened a Dallas facility to help provide legal paperwork to 3,000 young men every several weeks.

Mayorkas is also creating new ways to fly migrants in from other countries, regardless of national laws curbing chain migration, Mayorkas wrote:

We are restarting and expanding the Central American Minors program. It creates a lawful pathway for children to come to the United States without having to take the dangerous journey. Under this expansion, children will be processed in their home countries and brought to the United States in a safe and orderly way…

Mayorkas is also allying with pro-migration international groups and private groups to help them deliver more wage-cutting, rent-raising migrants into Americans’ blue-collar labor market. He wrote:

We are developing additional legal and safe pathways for children and others to reach the United States. While we are building a formal refugee program throughout the region, we are working with Mexico, the Northern Triangle countries, and international organizations to establish processing centers in those countries so that individuals can be screened through them and brought to the United States if they qualify for relief under our humanitarian laws and other authorities.

[Joe Biden’s DHS Chief Says He Is Opening New Doors for Migrants, by Neil Munro, Breitbart, March 16, 2021]

Mayorkas repeatedly claims this is all legal, but that is a lie. Take the “asylum” issue. If an alien qualifies for asylum, that alien does not need any “additional legal and safe pathways” to enter the United States. The truth is that these aliens in question do not qualify for asylum or refugee status. For the uninitiated, a refugee is defined as a person suffering from persecution in his country of nationality and is outside the United States. An asylee is a person inside the United States who meets the definition of a refugee, except being in the United States.

What Mayorkas is doing is bringing into the United States persons who would normally need to apply to the United Nations High Commissioner For Refugees (UNHCR) claiming persecution in their country of nationality, be approved, and then apply to the United States requesting admission as a refugee. Mayorkas is shortcutting this system, designed to weed out fraud and frivolous applications, though, for the record, not very successful at that.

However, none of the citizens of the source nations in Central America legally qualify as refugees or asylees. None suffer from persecution by the governments of their countries of citizenship. The basis of their claims is that they are poor, there is no work, there is crime, their government is corrupt and incompetent’s, and, if a woman, their husband beats them. Asylum and refugee status don’t cover those issues. The only issue covered is the wife-beating issue, but that is a separate status and generally only applies to persons already in the United States. This policy will also include aliens from countries other than the Central American shitholes, as the Central American program is not limited to Central Americans, but any alien who can reach Central America or Mexico.

The plan is to bring these aliens to the United States under a parole status, of which the likely two rationalizations are Humanitarian Parole (HR) or Public Interest Parole (PIP), which, in turn, have specialty sub-programs for various “emergencies”, such as Filipino World War II veterans. You did not likely know that there is a serious emergency regarding Filipino WWII veterans, the emergency being that not enough of them, their spouses, their children and their childrens’ spouses and children have immigrated to the United States. Note that the United States was admitting Filipino WWII veterans immediately after WWII, then between 90s until the late 2000s when a second legal program for those veterans ended. But that was not enough, the United States needs more 90 year old fraudulent WWII veterans.

It must be noted that the abuse of parole above is not within the bounds of the law as written, the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) , as amended makes that clear.

Here is the law:

(5)(A) The Attorney General may, except as provided in subparagraph (B) or in section 214(f), in his discretion parole into the United States temporarily under such conditions as he may prescribe only on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit any alien applying for admission to the United States, but such parole of such alien shall not be regarded as an admission of the alien and when the purposes of such parole shall, in the opinion of the Attorney General, have been served the alien shall forthwith return or be returned to the custody from which he was paroled and thereafter his case shall continue to be dealt with in the same manner as that of any other applicant for admission to the United States.

(B) The Attorney General may not parole into the United States an alien who is a refugee unless the Attorney General determines that compelling reasons in the public interest with respect to that particular alien require that the alien be paroled into the United States rather than be admitted as a refugee under section 207.

[Immigration and Nationality Act: Section 212 – General Classes Of Aliens Ineligible To Receive Visas And Ineligible For Admission; Waivers Of Inadmissibility, unattributed,, undated]

The first point about parole is that it is restricted to the temporary entry, not admission, of an alien, then the subsequent removal of that alien. While paragraph B allows for the parole of an alien who otherwise is a refugee, that requires “compelling reasons,” not a generalized policy of admitting more refugees, and, more importantly, it applies only to those who otherwise qualify as refugees. That means the alien in question must be the victim of persecution, not fleeing poverty, crime, or an abusive husband.

Let me illustrate this with uses of parole from history. While I was with the legacy Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) in the 1990s, we were paroling tens of thousands of citizens of Vietnam into the United States. This was long after the persecutions of the population of Viet Nam had ended after the low points between 1975 to 1989. After the Berlin Wall fell, the Communists in Viet Nam got the message, and ended most political persecution. The main victims of persecution had either fled the nation between 1975 and 1985 or been placed in re-education camps. However, most whom had been in camps had were long since released and resumed life in the mainly agricultural economy of southern Viet Nam. By 1989, Viet Nam had reached out to the refugee community in the United States and told them they were welcome back. And former refugees flooded back to Viet Nam to temporarily visit family and to invest in the newly opening Viet Nam economy. As an Inspector, not only did I deal with returning naturalized Americans of Vietnamese ancestry, but also those with green cards, Legal Permanent Residents, who obtained their legal residency based on an asylum or refugee claim. Technically that was illegal and grounds for deportation, as a refugee or asylee who returns to the nation from which they fled terminates the underlying legal basis for asylum or refugee status, as well as the derived legal permanent residence, by placing themselves under the jurisdiction of the government they fled. Of course, neither George H.W. Bush or Bill Clinton enforced that part of the law.

Nor did Bush or Clinton enforce the “case-by-case” review or the “compelling reasons” parts of the law for HR and PIP. Tens of thousands of Vietnamese who did not qualify as refugees came either from refugee camps in South East Asia or on direct flights from Ho Chi Minh City, and were subsequently paroled into the United States. They even came on the same fights as those with real refugee documents and returning Vietnamese-Americans and legal residents. In no way was there any individual review of their cases, but all were approved and processed by policy, no denials, the same as the Obama Regime policy of approving all DACA applicants and illegals paroled at the border during the Zerg Rush of 2014. Worse yet, even the ostensive definition of a refugee was expanded. Did you know that any Vietnamese citizen with non-Asian blood (Amer-Asian) was deemed qualified? This was in the law, presuming anyone appearing at least part White or black was the child of an American serviceman from the war, but there were many Whites in Viet Nam before the war, French and British, and after, Russians. Nothing was done to verify parentage. Also included using HP and PIP were relatives of these Amer-Asians, their own children, their extended family, and any member of a family that claimed to have adopted an Amer-Asian. That, of course, led to the sale of Amer-Asian street children as tickets to America, as most Amer-Asians in Viet Nam were abandoned by their mothers; left to Catholic orphanages or the streets. And these were being admitted without individualized review, but mass approved by policy Basically, HP and PIP are used well outside the legal authority and indiscriminately. Both are frauds and lies. And refugees from Viet Nam were still being approved well into the Jorge Bush and Obama Regimes.

One of the important aspects of parole is that if a person is paroled, they, unlike illegal aliens, can apply for legal permanent residency. That means that any alien paroled, is just a de facto immigrant with just a delay in obtaining a green card. This is one of the advantages of controlling the administrative reigns of power. The Obama Regime knew this and routinely gave parole to DACA and the fake refugees flooding the border in 2014, so they could stay permanently. [Obama Administration Lets DREAMers Leave And Re-Enter Country, Federale, VDare, October 23, 2014]

Now, I have no solution to this problem. The Democrats control Congress, the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General (DHS OIG) is a Deep State Republican with no interest or courage to take on the illegality of the Biden Regime. A legislative amnesty might be dead, but that is not saying much.

Billy Williams, FBI, DOJ, Immunizing Antifa Terrorists

The U.S. Attorney for the District of Oregon, Billy Williams, that for some strange reason Donald Trump failed to fire after he was inaugurated and subsequently replace with an aggressive conservative dedicated to smashing Antifa terrorists and illegal aliens, has resigned at the request of China Joe, but on the way out has been immunizing Antifa terrorists who have been attacking Federal officers and buildings in Portland over the past 4 years. Williams’ pro-terrorist and invader proclivities were well known during his tenure as the Obama U.S. Attorney for the District of Oregon, but Trump strangely let him stay on. And even after Williams acted to protect a local Mexican judge who aided a Mexican illegal alien to escape arrest. This was symptomatic of the complete failure of the Trump Administration to competently manage the Federal bureaucracy and impose its political will in the administration of justice. [Mexican Judge Helps Mexican Illegal Alien Escape, by Federale, VDare, March 5, 2017]

Billy Williams, Trump Appointee and Antifa Attorney

Aiding criminals is not unusual for Williams. He has long protected Antifa terrorists. And for some reason Sleepy Jeff did nothing to light a fire under him to arrests Democrat terrorists. [Deep State Obama Democrat Lets Antifa Terrorists Go Free In Portland, by Federale, VDare, July 13, 2020 and Obama-Appointed US Attorney Ignoring Antifa Terrorist Threats To DHS Officers, by Federale, VDare, July 5, 2019] On his way out as U.S. Attorney though, at the same time that the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have declared that every peaceful protester at the January 6 demonstration will be prosecuted, Williams has quietly begun dropping charges against his fellow Antifa terrorists.

According to federal court documents that were reviewed by KGW8 News, federal prosecutors have dismissed more than one-third of cases stemming from the violent protests that occurred on a nightly basis in downtown Portland over summer 2020.

In their review, the news outlet found that 31 of the 90 protest cases have been dismissed by the U.S. Department of Justice, including a mix of misdemeanor and felony charges. Some of the most serious charges dropped include four defendants charged with assaulting a federal officer, which is a felony.

Reportedly, more than half of the dropped charges were “dismissed with prejudice,” which means that the case cannot be brought back to court. Several former federal prosecutors described this as extremely rare.

These dismissals of protest cases run counter to the tough talk that came from the U.S. Department of Justice over summer 2020.

[Report: Federal Prosecutors Quietly Dismiss Nearly One-Third Of Violent Protests Cases From Summer 2020, by Jenna Curren, Law Enforcement Today, March 4, 2021]

To say that dismissals with prejudice are “extremely rare” in the Federal system is an understatement. Such dismissals are virtually unknown. In fact, the only similar occurrence is the dismissal of cases after the Inauguration Day Riots; those cases were sabotaged by a Magistrate Judge with the connivance of the Trump appointed U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Jessie Liu. Note the pattern, Democrat terrorists rioting and attacking democracy are not arrested, or if arrested, charges are dropped. Christopher Wray and the FBI refused to make arrests in the Portland riots, most arrests were made by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the U.S. Marshals, the U.S. Border Patrol, and even ICE SVU. The FBI was completely absent when their fellow Federal agents were being attacked, assaulted, and even blinded with lasers. However everyone who entered the Capitol Building to peacefully protects a stolen election will and are being arrested.

This is more than the Trump Administration failure on personnel is policy, it is symptomatic of incompetence. Immigration patriots have no friend in another Jared Kushner Administration. It is time to find a new immigration patriot to lead the fight against Beijing Biden and Kamala Haaretz.

Blacks, Pakis, and Mulattos Hate Their Japanese Hosts

That blacks and immigrants are ungrateful and hostile to their host countries is a truism. America is plagued with black crime and ungrateful immigrants. Sadly, both are coming to Japan, with blacks leading the way as the most ungrateful of immigrants. The only real question is why a hate-filled black immigrant would want to go to Japan, other than to destroy Japan and make it less Japanese. Japan is over 98% Japanese ethnicity, with Chinese and Koreans making up the majority of the non-Japanese population. The next closest group are mentally-ill weebo, mostly White, Youtubers who spend most of their time complaining about the cost and size of apartments, the lack of vegan cuisine (hint: why eat cardboard when you can have wagyu and otoro?), laughing at some peculiar Japanese habits, or wondering why no one is stealing their bicycle. Hint, few blacks and even Japan’s indigenous criminal class, the Yakuza, doesn’t do street crime.

There are though a growing number of mostly black whiners who move to Japan, then realize that Japan is not black enough for them. Sadly, such blacks are ensconced in academia in Japan for some reason and using their privileged positions at Universities to hate on Japan and the Japanese. [Black War On Japan, Federale, Federale Blog, July 15, 2019]

It is not just the ghetto blacks from America that are the problem though. England has been exporting its blacks to and Pakis to Japan as well. And they have nothing to do but complain.

Equality, Diversity and inclusion (EDI) is a topic that pervades the corporate human resources dialogue, and 2017 was the year we saw things really begin to change for minority groups in Japan. From the progression of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s Womenomics agenda, to the passing of legislation to protect individuals against bullying based on gender identity and sexual orientation, Japan is beginning to make strides in the equality arena.

A growing number of professional networks and groups are being created to provide a place for minorities to share experiences, get support and not feel alone. Such groups can be found at firms or they may take the form of larger external organisations [sic]. In the UK, they are plentiful, although in Japan there is some room for growth, particularly when it comes to those catering to non-Japanese.

Concerning the importance of EDI-related groups, BCCJ ACUMEN spoke to four organ­isations: the Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) Lawyers Tokyo Network; For Empowering Women in Japan (FEW); Women Who Code Tokyo; and Nijiiro Diversity.

[Strength In Numbers: The Growth Of Japan’s Equality, Diversity And Inclusion Groups, Maxine Cheyney, Japan Today, January 26, 2018]

Of course, Japan did not become the world’s third largest economy and a the number 2 exporter by diversity, equity, and inclusion. Japan obtained all it has today by sacrifice, unity, and hard work. It did not include the outsider, but demanded conformity, hard work, and submission to leadership. Japan has a very low level of income disparity for an industrialized nation and it has a government that thinks of the nation and its people as a whole, but it rejects equity, rejects racial or diversity of thought, but does include every Japanese in the benefits of society as a whole. Throughout the modernization of Japan after the opening to the West under the Meiji Period and the recovery from the Second World War, the Showa Period the non-Japanese population contributed nothing, mostly because there were none, other than Koreans. Blacks and so-called minorities weren’t there and other than White experts in practical areas during Meiji and occupation troops during the late Showa, there was no diversity in Japan. In fact, as the black population has grown in Japan, Japan’s economic productivity has stagnated to a certain extent. Though that is likely caused by an aging population and the rise of China rather than the presence of blacks, but there is no evidence in Japan, or elsewhere, that diversity, meaning racial diversity, is a positive for any aspect of the economy or society. Diversity is at all times a hinderance to economic growth, social harmony, and crime control. Just look at Baltimore. Diversity is just bad for you.

And every unhappy blacks are seeking out another nation to destroy. Imagine this, you get an advance degree, immigrate to Japan, then just hate on your hosts and their culture.

James Nepaulsingh, a lawyer in Japan for 10 years, set up the BME Lawyers Tokyo Network in February 2017 to promote a positive message. He told BCCJ ACUMEN one of his major influences was a group of black University of Cambridge students, who published a photo of themselves to promote the institution as a place at which other black people can thrive in.

Why does he want to make Japan more black? Japan was fine without blacks and rose mightily in the world without any blacks. But for some reason, blacks need to change Japan so they can thrive. Can’t they thrive in Africa? And why is a Pakistani from England so concerned about blacks? Is it a grift, most likely. Affirmative action can be damaging to a receipient, but there is more here. Why, because while Nepaulsingh is complaining about the Japanese, he admits he has nothing to complain about. Other than the gaijin card he uses to get a seat on crowded trains.

“I wanted to do the same for Japan and make [Japan] appeal to black and minority ethnic groups”, he said. “Before I came out to Japan I was given a lot of misinformation about how BME people were treated in Japan, and so I wanted to create that sort of positive image”.

Although Nepaulsingh himself has not faced any direct discrimination, he has noted a few things about being a minority in Japan.

“What is interesting in Japan is, I think, all foreigners are put in the same bucket. So I’ve heard white people, for example, complain about no one sitting next to them on the train”, he said.

I have written about the train seat issue. At worst it is amusing. I have never noticed it directly, but know of the phenomenon, but accommodate myself to the possible sensitivities of my Japanese hosts. In fact, the Japanese are amazingly tolerant of gaijin, i.e. foreigners, even those who commit social blunders or faux pas. This is called the gaijin card by the mostly annoying Youtubers of Japan. Not only has Nepaulsingh not been discriminated against, but admits stories of discrimination are not true.

Pakistani Unhappy In Japan

So, why then are blacks and other minorities so riled up? Basically, it is why American blacks are so angry, knowledge that they are inferior to their larger societies and incessant propaganda from the Jews that they are victims of some White and Japanese conspiracy against them. Why else would Nepaulsingh believe stories that he admits turned out not to be true? Likely Nepaulsingh was hired by his British company for his skin color and affirmative action points, or even as protection against racial discrimination lawsuits. Britain suffers from the same hostile regime of racial preferences for failing minorities as does America. And Nepaulsingh just brings that mentality to Japan, as does Maxine Cheyney, another non-White who hates on Japan while exploiting Japan’s hospitality.

Well, Japan did not succeed by being a resentful whiner, but by racial unity, social cohesion, and an enforced hierarchy, not by diversity, blacks, and immigrants.

Maxine Cheyney Japan Hating Immigrant

The demons have targeted Japan, and just as diversity means hunting down the last White man, it also means nation busting in Japan. Observe the title of the article, “Strength in Numbers…” Well, this sounds like a plan, or a threat, to flood Japan with non-Japanese. Nepaulsingh wants to make Japan more black. Almost as if the Kalergi Plan wasn’t a conspiracy theory, but an actual, well, plan. Just that Europe and America aren’t the only victims. And note that this anti-White and anti-Japanese racism is the official position of the British Chamber of Commerce and Her Majesty’s Government.

Japan Needs The Bomb

And so do Poland and Hungary, as well as a few others like Myanmar, formerly known as Burma. China Joe and his Jewish Cabinet are not only planning war on White Americans, the Historic American Nation, but also on all others who oppose the emerging Chinese-Jewish alliance to dominate the world.

Contrary to the opinion of those on the Alt-Right, China is not our friend, nor is it an opponent of Jewish power, it is a rival to Jewish power, but it is willing to work with Jewish power and divide the world among them. As we speak, China is desperately trying to buy up Eastern Europe, the components of the former Soviet Union, and the rest of Asia. It is also trying to bring back into its sphere of influence the traditional tributary states that now make up the modern nation-states of Korea, Japan, and Vietnam, as well as the territory of the former tributary tribes on the first island chain, the Senkakus and the Ryuku Islands, commonly known as Okinawa, in the East China Sea, as well as other island chains in the South China Seas. Red China is also purchasing or bullying the hill and mountain tribes of what is now Kampuchea, Laos, Thailand, and Burma. Word to the Alt-Right, China is the power behind the military government and the recent coup in Myanmar, not Jews. Also targeted are the now energy and mineral wealthy far western fiefdoms in Central Asia once held by the T’ang, Ming, and Ch’ing dynasties, but now in the Russian and Muslim sphere of influence. The old Silk Road was important then for Chinese exports, now the new Silk Road is important for water, hydrocarbons, and minerals necessary for the workshop of the world.

Japan, the strongest of China’s opponents in the East, is a target of China’s plan to reimpose tributary status on the Land of the Rising Sun.

China on Monday justified the entry of its coast guard vessels into Japan’s territorial waters near the Tokyo-controlled, Beijing-claimed Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea, saying they are the country’s “inherent territory.”

Last Monday, China put into effect the controversial legislation that allows its coast guard to use weapons against foreign ships that it sees as illegally entering its waters, sparking fears that Japanese vessels navigating around the Senkakus would be targeted.

Beijing’s patrol and legal enforcement activities in the waters near the islets are “legitimate measures taken by China to safeguard sovereignty in accordance with law,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin told reporters.

Chinese coast guard ships on Sunday entered Japan’s territorial waters around the islands for the second day in a row. Wang did not elaborate what kind of activities the vessels were engaged in.

[China Justifies Coast Guard’s Entry Into Japan’s Territorial Waters, unattributed, Japan Today, February 9, 2021]

In exchange for allowing a Red China a free hand, Jewish power is getting a deal on Chinese non-interference in the coming dictatorship in the West. The battleground will be Africa, as its population debarks for Europe, and soon to America, under the Kalergi Plan of displacement of Europeans and Americans from their patrimony by electing a new people, the Chinese are moving in not only buying up land and populations in Africa, but exporting Chinese citizens to a lifetime of servitude in the new Chinese colonies. Recently, Chinese were declared to be fellow victims of apartheid in South Africa. This is the first step in a long term plan to outflank Jewish power in the Dark Continent. Frankly, it looks like in the long term the Chinese will win, if they can revive their population growth. Of which they have now realized their blunder over the one-child policy of yesteryear.

But back to the emerging New World Order, one where Whites are the primary target. And for this matter, the Japanese are considered White. White is the standard of beauty and prestige in Japan. And Whiteness is of such import that any expression of that Whiteness must be crushed, even if it is in the Orient.

Recent developments in Japan have shown that the Evil Eye of Sauron, both Chinese and Jewish, have extended their gaze on the all too resistant Japanese.

First, Japan remains a traditional society. Minor eruptions of sexism are of no import to the Japanese people. Only contrived outrage by the Jewish influenced press makes it an issue. At hand is that the head of the Japanese Olympic Committee, former Prime Minister, Yoshiro Mori.

As public anger toward Tokyo Olympics chief Yoshiro Mori’s sexist remarks continues unabated, critics have pointed out how they have exposed the lack of progress made so far in eliminating entrenched discrimination against women in Japan…

Mori sparked the sexism row in a gathering of the Japanese Olympic Committee last week, when he said women tend to talk too much in meetings as they have “a strong sense of rivalry.”

At the same time, he said the seven women currently sitting on the 35-member board of the Tokyo Olympic organizing committee “understand their place,” in remarks apparently meant to praise them by exempting them from his criticism.

He later retracted the comments and apologized but insisted he will not resign despite mounting calls for his removal.

Japan consistently ranks poorly in the World Economic Forum’s gender gap rankings, coming 121st out of 153 countries in 2020 and occupying last place among major advanced economies. Women made up only 5.2 percent of executives at all listed Japanese companies as of 2019, according to government data.

The government set a goal in 2003 of filling around 30 percent of leadership positions in the country with women by 2020, but failed to meet the target as the issue was sidelined by other political and economic initiatives. The date was then pushed back to “as soon as possible within the 2020s.”

[Mori’s Sexist Remarks Show Slow Progress In Narrowing Japan Gender Gap, unattributed, Japan Today, February 10, 2021]

Basically, most women in Japan don’t want to be angry harpies and the left in the West is enraged. And there are a few Judaized harpies in Japan.

“Mr. Mori has been gaffe-prone, but this remark should not be attributed to his character. This is a problem of how decisions are made in Japan and how men in power are biased,” Kiriu Minashita, a sociology and gender studies professor at Kokugakuin University, said of the 83-year-old former prime minister.

“We should not only seek (Mori’s) resignation but also correct the background that generated his remarks,” Minashita said…

“Mr. Mori’s remarks symbolize traditional Japan Inc.’s pathology,” said Yoshihisa Aono, the 49-year-old president of software development firm Cybozu Inc. who has advocated for separate surnames for married couples in Japan. Married couples are currently legally required to share a surname, with wives expected to abandon their maiden names.

Aono said Mori has failed to “update” his values from the division of labor by gender, in which men earn a living and women focus on domestic and care duties.

Japan realizes that women are more important at home, raising families and passing on the Japanese language and culture at home. And will work to that end.

In 2018, Tokyo Medical University and several other schools were found to have been deducting entrance exam scores for female applicants. The schools’ explanation was that, believing female doctors tend to resign or take long periods of leave after getting married or giving birth, they were acting to prevent a shortage of doctors at affiliated hospitals.

Even some corporate executives who address gender gaps in their businesses are not free from unconscious bias, said Nana Otsuki, executive director at online securities company Monex Inc.

“Many men do not disagree with the idea of women being active unless they become threats to them,” said Otsuki, who also serves as an outside director for listed Japanese companies. “It is important for co-workers to genuinely acknowledge the accomplishments of female workers when they become board candidates.”

There are lots of complaints about inequality in Japan, but the statistics really show that Japanese women don’t want to become office drones or power seekers. They want a happy family life.

The gender balance in the Japanese political realm is also far from being equal. The proportion of female lawmakers in the lower house stood at 9.9 percent last October, ranking 167th out of 190 countries, according to the Geneva-based Inter-Parliamentary Union. In local assemblies nationwide, the figure was 14 percent in 2019, according to Ichikawa Fusae Center for Women and Governance.

And Japan is not the only target of Gender Studies Professors and Trannies. Poland and Hungary are also targets of China Joe and his puppeteers.

Joe Biden appeared to suggest the elected, conservative governments of NATO allies Hungary and Poland are “totalitarian regimes” like Belarus.

Speaking at a town hall event on Thursday on foreign policy, the Democratic party presidential candidate praised Donald Trump “on the deal with Israel recently” but condemned the U.S. President’s supposed inaction with regards to Russia and North Korea.

“You see what’s happened in everything from Belarus to Poland to Hungary, and the rise of totalitarian regimes in the world,” Biden said, telling the ABC-screened event: “This President embraces all the thugs in the world. I mean, he is best friends with the leader of North Korea, sending love letters.”

[Joe Biden Blasts Conservative Govts of NATO Allies Poland and Hungary as ‘Totalitarian Regimes,’ by Virginia Hale, Breitbart, October 18, 2020]

The only solution for Japan, Poland, Hungary and other nations facing these attacks from Red China and Jewish power is to be too powerful to attack. Russia knows this and for that reason has expanded and improved its nuclear capacity, specifically in offensive nuclear weapons. This is why both Israel and the United States are not attacking Iran and North Korea, because they both either have or are suspected to have a nuclear capacity.

It is, of course, ironic that to survive, Japan must make itself a nuclear power. It was the innocent victim of a contrived war at the behest of a failing empire, Great Britain, a rising empire, the U.S., on behalf of Jewish power. Then at the end, attacked with atomic bombs. This itself is being used by Jewish controlled press in Japan to oppose rearmament, visits to the Yasukuni Shrine by Japanese officials and members of the Imperial House, and the necessary step for survival, the adoption of nuclear weapons, not only to keep Japan safe from the Red China threat, but also the threat from China Joe and his predominately Jewish Cabinet. The Jews hate traditionalist societies, whether they be Poland, Hungary, Burma, or Japan.

Only the Bomb will protect Japan from both imperial powers in the world. Same with Poland and Hungary. Which might lead to an interesting revanchist movement, Magyar Winged Samurai allied with Tsar Vladimir to save the traditionalist world.

Japan Opens To Diversity, Mass Immigration, Or Does It?

One of the criticisms of Westerners of the Japanese is what is often called dishonesty, or more bluntly, lying. Lying is a complicated topic in Japanese society. In Japan it is generally discouraged to give one’s blunt opinions of something. In some ways it is an effort to maintain a harmonious society, in some ways not being singled out for societal displeasure, in some ways meant not to offend with a negative answer; the phenomenon is referred to in Japanese society as omote-ura or honne-tatemae. It can also be a tactic of self-preservation or survival tool in the wider world, the corporate environment, school, and even in the family. The Japanese, of course, understand this phenomenon in their own society and take it into account.

The opening of Japan in the late 19th century resulted in a general misunderstanding between Westerners and Japanese, and though obviously not with other Asians; Koreans and Chinese, who have similar practices and generally looser relationships with the truth. Lying has until recently been condemned in the West under the influence of Christianity. Hiding truths is not an aspect of Christianity, especially when one’s immortal soul is at stake.

Now, the Chinese have long used deception, misdirection, and lying to manage barbarians, and to manage their peasants, bandits, and merchants. The mandarins and the Throne knew they were the source of power and control in China, but knew they had to manage their subjects. Truth was never really part of that management program, though competence was necessary for the Mandate of Heaven. The Japanese are heavily influenced by Chinese culture. Neo-Confucianism was the official ideology of the Tokugawa Shogunate, but with Japanese characteristics, as Mao said of Communism. Early on, the Japanese, when they realized how weak they were before the engines of Western industrialization in the late 19th century, had to use their own method of managing the barbarians. One of these was a public face for the barbarian to see, and a hidden true feeling, and consequent actions that reflect the true feeling rather than the publicly expressed opinion.

Whatever the relationship between the West and Japan was in the far past, currently truthfulness is of little import in the West. The West even denies biological reality and diplomacy is the literal practice of lying, so there is little room for criticism of Japan and the Japanese for their relationship with the truth, especially over the late unpleasantness in the 40s.

Objective denial of reality is now de rigueur in the West. Whether it be that one can change one’s sex or that diversity is strength, we in the West now live in an objective denial of reality, much less Revealed Truth. So the flexible relationship the Japanese have with public expressions of their true feelings or how that manifests itself in public or international behavior is of no concern of mine.

That brings us to the relationship in Japan with diversity; and, importantly, the public face of their view of diversity for consumption by the West, and the Jewish power behind the West, and their true feeling about the gaijin, especially non-Whites and non-East Asians, i.e. blacks and South Asians. Generally the Japanese see East Asians as racial cousins and Whites as prestigious.

The only question we really must address, is what are the Japanese up to in a certain disturbing announcement from Japanese Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi. An announcement that may either result in the mogrelification of Japan or may be a tactic to avoid attack by China Joe and his masters, who are not Chinese. (h/t Author W. R. Flynn)

The Japanese foreign minister has announced a plan to “transform Japan into a diversified multiethnic society” by encouraging mass immigration and giving foreign residents the right to vote.

Toshimitsu Motegi is a politician for the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and has served as the country’s Minister for Foreign Affairs since September 2019.

During a Q and A session, Motegi said his “national vision” meant “transforming Japan in the 21st century into a “diversified multiethnic society” by way of mass immigration from all over the world.

This would also be achieved by codifying English as the country’s second language and giving “suffrage to resident foreigners.”

Japan is 98.1 per cent ethnically Japanese, with the next most populous ethnicity being Chinese at just 0.5 per cent.

[Japanese Foreign Minister Announces Plan to “Transform Japan Into a Diverse Multiethnic Society,” by Paul Joseph Watson, Summit News, November 25, 2021]

Shocking as it is, this is even beyond absurd. Japan has a population problem, but that can be solved by natalist policies that are working in Russia, Poland, and Hungary. However, one understands that Japan is also a target of the nation-busting Jewish groups that, in fact, hate the diversity that Japan represents, a racially based ethno-state. [Federale In Japan: It Works—And It Could Work In The U.S. Too, by Federale, VDare, October 30, 2013]

For us, what we need to know is Motegi speaking honne, truly held feeling, or tatemae, something said for the public consumption of the dangerous ideologs in the West who may make war on Japan for not being diverse? Remember, diversity is not only tracking down and killing the last White man, but also the Last Samurai.

Perhaps we can find the answer in the true attitude to diversity as expressed in Japanese nationality law, Japan’s foreign students, and the Japanese attitude to English.

Let us compare Japan’s system of teaching English to that of Europe’s. Most Americans know that many Europeans speak fluent English, most know the French don’t like English, and few know that English proficiency is widespread in the former captive nations of Eastern Europe. Japan, one of wealthiest industrialized nations ranks far behind Western Europeans, in English proficiency, even the notoriously Anglophobic French. But Japan even lags far behind many Third World counties, and I don’t mean only those in either the English or American colonial spheres like India and the Philippines.

One of the reasons though is that most Japanese don’t need much English. Small nations like the Netherlands or the Scandinavian countries need English as a skill set to survive economically in the European Union and the wider world. Japan, with a much larger population than almost any European country, has little need for English. English is prestigious in Japan, but not a necessity. No blue collar worker really needs it, even in the tourism industry. Having traveled throughout Japan as a tourist, only major Western brand hotels in the three major cities, Tokyo, Osaka, and Kyoto, have employees who speak English to any degree. In other cities or in Japanese brand hotels, much less the traditional hotels, ryokan, English was unknown. Even in other industries for Japanese companies with an international customer base, English while necessary, is not an imperative. Most such companies rely on a small cadre who speak English well and serve as translators, rather than as the business point-man.

Basically, while the Japanese government invests much money in teaching English starting in elementary school, it is ineffective, and perhaps deliberately so. Watch this video on English teaching in Japan. The major complaint is that it is ineffective. If the Japanese government thought English was so important, it would likely do better. Not saying that the Japanese government is 100% efficient, but when it sees a real problem, it deals with it. Despite public pronouncements, I believe that the real feeling about the importance of English is that it is not an imperative. Japanese leaders believe that social cohesion and prosperity for the widest range of their fellow citizens is important. Consequently policies reflect that. English proficiency may be tatemae, only for public consumption by the diversity obsessed in the West and certain groups ensconced in the major Japanese press.

Similarly, Japan announced a few years ago a policy of more foreign students in their universities. Why? One does not know. Japanese is an incredibly difficult language to learn and there are few languages closely related, unlike the Latin languages of Spanish, Italian, French, and Portuguese, or a language like English which has adopted much foreign vocabulary from French and the Germanic languages. Learning Japanese is more for specialists or those with an affinity for Japanese culture. It is not for business, technology, military, sciences, or international commerce. English is the language of those areas of endeavor. If you’re interested in samurai, bonsai, anime, Buddhist philosophy, or woodblock printing, Japanese is for you. Otherwise, it is for the Japanese.

Last month, it surfaced that 700 foreign students at Tokyo University of Social Welfare who were supposed to be studying Japanese in preparation for becoming undergraduates at the same university had gone missing, with their whereabouts still unknown. Since the normal procedure is to expel such students and nullify their student visas, they must be staying somewhere in this country as illegal workers.

This incident is only the tip of an iceberg. Virtually all of about 90,000 foreign students registered at 749 Japanese-language schools across the country are working at places like convenience stores, lodging facilities, bars and restaurants, and construction sites. The primary purpose of their enrollment with such schools is not to study Japanese but to work and earn money. It is believed that virtually none of them are interested in advancing to institutions of higher education after studying the language.

[Foreign Student Numbers Don’t Tell Whole Tale, by Takamitsu Sawa, The Japan Times, April 12, 2019]

The Japanese half-assed a program to enroll foreigners in their university system when Japanese Universities are not attractive to foreigners other than for the Nipponophile. Who would go to study sociology in Japan? Now Chiang Kai-shek studied in Japan, but that was 100 years ago when China was behind Japan in industrialization and modern militarization. But now? Unlikely that anyone other than the Nipponophile would study anything in Japan. You can learn anime there, but not much else. In any event, to protect the Japanese people and a harmonious society from the China Flu, Japan is once again closing to foreigners. Shades of the Tokugawa policy of sakoku, the closure of Japan to foreigners?

It can be concluded that this program is not a reflection of the real Japanese attitude, but the obsession of a foreign educated cohort at the major Japanese newspapers who think themselves worldly liberals, though toadying the Jewish line on the god of diversity. So, the Japanese elite placate the scribblers in the major Japanese press by creating a program they know will fail to appease the diversity mongers in power in the outside world. Tatemae again one hopes.

But the real good news is that a Japanese court has complied with the Japanese Constitution and, more importantly, the national consciousness of the Japanese people instead of the internationalist ideology of the deracinated. Instead of imposing internationalist values on Japan, it ruled that dual citizenship remains illegal in Japan! Sonno Jo I!

The Tokyo District Court ruled Thursday that the country’s nationality law, which forbids citizens from holding multiple nationalities, is constitutional, in a judicial decision believed to be the first concerning the regulation.

In a lawsuit filed with the court, eight men and women in their 30s to 80s, who were born in Japan but now live in Europe, claimed the law’s stipulation that Japanese citizens must give up their nationality upon obtaining a foreign nationality violates the Constitution.

[Tokyo Court Backs Ban On Japanese Holding Dual Nationality, unattributed, The Japan Times, January 21, 2021]

Note the stress on maintaining a harmonious society and implicit racial unity, instead of individual interest and proclivity.

But the government argued the plaintiffs’ claim took no note of national interest, and that permitting multiple citizenship would allow people to have voting rights or diplomatic protection in other countries.

Dual citizenship “could cause conflict in the rights and obligations between countries, as well as between the individual and the state,” said Presiding Judge Hideaki Mori.

In a very un-Japanese claim, a Japanese overseas complained about individual feelings being more important than ethno-national unity and social harmony.

“The court did not seriously consider the feelings of Japanese living abroad,” Swiss resident Hitoshi Nogawa, 77, who led the plaintiffs, said following the ruling.

One can say with certainty, Nogawa is no longer Japanese and has absorbed the poisonous ideology of diversity and individualism. The court has spoke for the Japanese, and has spoken honne.

With that, one hopes that Foreign Minister Motegi is not speaking his true feeling, and is acting publicly, omote, so as for Japan to not to be the further target of the internationalists.

Time will tell. Other Japanese leaders understand that diversity is bad.