The Biden political campaign seems to be in a panic. Joe Biden, in an effort to counter the continuing public disgust at the open borders, has decided to highlight the problem by attacking Japan and India, two nations that have little or no immigration. For India, only those of Indian ethnicity may immigrate to India permanently and become Indian citizens, with the exception of spouses of Indian citizens. Otherwise permanently and legally immigrating to India is impossible. Even their political refugees are generally restricted to ethnic Indians or Hindus fleeing violence in nearby nations, such as Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh. Japan has less strict immigration, but requires fluency in Japanese, employment, and good moral character as legal restrictions, and even more informal restrictions such as letting the gaijin know occasionally that everyone knows that they are welcome as a guest, but we don’t accept that you are really part of our society.
Japan and India are the core members of the American strategy to contain the vastly expanding Chinese military reach, with the Chinese claiming Japanese Senkaku Islands and large parts of India, including Arunachal Pradesh State and the Aksai Chin plateau, as well as the whole of most of the junior Himalayan states that border India, Sikkim, Nepal, and Bhutan. In an effort to avoid war and present a united front, the Trump Administration built a new coalition to prevent war with China, the Indo-Pacific Alliance, consisting of Japan, India, and the United States at the core, with the Republic of China (Taiwan), Australia, and the Republic of Korea as junior partners.
The Biden Regime has continued the Trump policy of speaking softly and carrying a big stick, but the crazed ideology of the Biden Regime on immigration appears to be a new fault line in the alliance. Biden’s crazed support for mass illegal immigration has caused him to publicly attack both India and Japan over their restrictive immigration policies. [h/t reader W.R. Flynn]
The only real question is why this outburst, is the Biden’s growing senility or are the rabid junior staffers getting out of control when writing his talking points? Or both. Biden seems more and more insane on the immigration issue, doubling down now on bringing two million Palestinians to the United States in the middle of an election. Interestingly, there is no push back on Biden’s tirade from the Department of State (DOS), led by Jewish-American Anthony Blinken. Is that the official position of American Jewry to attack allies essential to avoid war with a resurgent China and flood the nation with Palestinians. I though George Soros issued orders to contain China? Perhaps the China dove, Larry Fink, is in control of the Biden Regime rather than Soros. It is a wonder that American foreign policy is a fight between two Jewish billionaires.
For months, President Biden has been under pressure to prove he can be tough at the border. But at a campaign reception on Wednesday night, he also tried to voice his commitment to America’s long history of immigration.
He did so by taking a swipe at two of America’s partners, saying that Japan and India are struggling economically “because they’re xenophobic.” He said the two democratic countries, along with China and Russia, “don’t want immigrants.”
“Immigrants are what makes us strong,” the president told the crowd of supporters. “Not a joke. That’s not hyperbole, because we have an influx of workers who want to be here and want to contribute.”
The comments have the potential to be a diplomatic irritant for the administration, which has spent years courting the governments of both Japan and India as part of the president’s strategy to counter Chinese aggression in the region. Japan and India are two of the five allies Mr. Biden has hosted with state dinners at the White House since taking office.
The limited modified walk-back appeared to just be begging for Japan and India to ignore Biden’s crazed statement; a sort of plea to just forget about it.
John F. Kirby, the national security spokesman at the White House, told reporters Thursday that Mr. Biden was trying to make a comment about America’s immigrant “DNA,” not insult other countries. And he insisted that officials in India and Japan understand that.
“Our allies and partners know well in tangible ways how President Biden values them, their friendship, their cooperation,” Mr. Kirby said.
It is certain that India is deeply concerned, as the Biden Regime has been attacking India for their support for Russia and India’s continued consumption of both Russian and Iranian oil.
But the real issue is this real Biden, obsessed with mongrelizing every other nation as well? The Biden Regime is also obsessed with spreading homosexuality and transgenderism in Japan. It appears to be a special concern of Rahm Emanuel, the Jewish former Mayor of Chicago and Obama Chief Of Staff, now the U.S. Ambassador to Japan.
But a recent string of messages about gay and transgender rights, culminating in a video Mr. Emanuel released on Twitter earlier this month, has drawn considerable ire among conservatives in Japan. Critics say the ambassador has overstepped the bounds of diplomacy and crossed into unwanted interference in domestic policy.
This suggests that the Biden Regime agenda is the social destruction of the very nations that they claim they need to contain China. It seems irrational, but only if you believe that the real goal is preventing war with China, rather than spreading social destruction and collapse to two of America’s major trade allies. But given that the Biden Regime has presided over the destruction of the German economy while encouraging Third World immigration to Germany, perhaps that is the plan, destroy the three biggest economies, other than China, that export to the United States, before immigration, diversity, and social collapse destroy America. It is almost as if the Biden Regime is running a race to the bottom for the whole world through immigration and sexual degeneracy. I wonder where Israel will get their advanced aircraft, bombs, and loan guarantees if America collapses under the weight of immigration and degeneracy? Is Anthony Blinken not thinking ahead? Is it the purpose of statesmen to avoid problems? Apparently not, it seems that Biden, Blinken, and Emanuel are heading full speed down the crazy track.
The online right is all a twitter about what is happening on college campuses. University students are protesting the Israeli war of aggression against the Palestinian enclave in Gaza. For certain the Israelis, in reality just jews, are claiming it is a response to the Hamas attack from Gaza into Israel proper, including territory that was assigned to the Palestinians by the United Nations 1947 partition. Like it or not, that is the controlling legal authority and it is the only solution to the current dispute in what is Palestine. While Hamas is a technically a non-State actor, it is the de facto government of part of the State of Palestine. But what does this have to do with the interests of patriotic White Americans? Superficially nothing. This is an overseas blood feud, though obviously Israel is the aggressor, but absent jewish political power in the United States, White America has no interest. The complication is that American policy in the Middle East is being made by jewish political power. So, the real issue is who are our allies in the fight against jewish control of America.
Some on the right, defined broadly to include all White Nationalists whether they think they are on the right or not, support not just Hamas in their war, but also the student demonstrators. Others say that the policy of the right should be deportations for both sides. This is all academic though, since all political power currently rests outside of the control of anyone with White America’s interests in mind.
The jews want America as a golem to do their bidding to defend Israel and, importantly, the jews want the Palestinians in the United States as one of their golems, to be used by the jews to make and maintain their power, as well as for their other nefarious purposes in the United States; White replacement, transgenderism, homosexuality, black crime, etc.
Some may try and deny it, claiming that Palestinian immigrants are like the mythical socially conservative Hispanic immigrant and are consequently an ally of Whites. Instead the reality is that both Hispanics and Palestinians are voting blocks for the radical jewish agenda. America’s most preeminent Palestinian anchor baby, Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib, is for open borders, homosexuality, transgenderism, and legal discrimination against White Americans. [Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib Walks the Walk: In the Pride Parade, and Beyond, by Ellen Shanna Knoppow, Pride Source, June 19, 2019] She is not just a supporter of the homosexual agenda, but she goes beyond. Well, that is not what White America needs.
Some claim that support for the student demonstrations is just a good strategy against the jews and their war aims. This is based on the supposition that support for Palestinians is breaking up the tenuous jewish coalition that runs the United States which consists of jews and various minority groups serving as janissaries, providing the manpower to administer the jewish run government, there being that there aren’t enough jews in the United States to staff the government and other institutions to serve their interests. Consequently, jews recruit an administrative class of janissaries to administer the Zionist Occupation Government (ZOG).
These janissaries are non-White immigrants in general, Indians in particular, trannys, homosexuals, and deluded White liberals. This is a confession though that Palestinians are part of the overall problem in the United States, though, when pressed, the advocates seem to be unable to explain the presence of Muslim immigrants in the jewish plan. Mostly they say the Muslims and Palestinians are deracinated and brainwashed by Globohomo after arriving here in and fall into compliance with ZOG plan. Palestinians though, seem to hang on to their grievances so currently in the news. The contradiction is that Palestinians both support the wider ZOG project as disaffected racial and religious minorities in the United States, while serving as a fissure in the coalition that jews need to rule, all because of the ongoing race war between Palestinians and jews in the Middle East.
Those who support the protesters also make a moral argument based on universal values against genocide and ethnic cleansing, but that is obviously pretentious moral posturing. Human beings really only care about those who are close to them; family, community, nation, and race. We know this because babies are racist, they react positively to photos of others of their same race, but negatively to those of other races. [Infants Show Racial Bias Toward Members Of Own Ethnicity, Against Those Of Others, unattributed, Science Daily, April 11, 2017] A preference for outsiders is atypical. Preference for the other clearly shows that some have been disconnected from the society they live in. Not an uncommon experience in humans as well.
There is also an argument that the protestors should be supported just because they are anti-jewish, damn the other consequences of supporting the Palestinians because any damage to the jewish power structure is good. Especially important though is that Palestinians do not reciprocate. No Palestinian group or major figure has supported White protestors who have been victimized by ZOG, such as the January 6th protestors or the Charlottesville protestors. Blind support for the student protestors is just rewarding them and getting nothing in return. Reciprocity is the basis of alliances in politics. The lack of reciprocity is a mirror image of those who they criticize, the White Protestant Christians who support Israel, but against whom the jews continue their program of social destruction in the United States. And literally spitting on them.
Jewish Reciprocity For Support From America
Importantly though, this discussion on whether the student demonstrators should be supported is blemished by the lack of honesty about the government reaction to the demonstrations.
What is happening is that the student demonstrators are being arrested and removed from many universities, some are claiming that excessive force is being used. The critics though are conflating the use of force with use of excessive force. The much more accurate criticism is that the university and governmental authorities are reacting swiftly and with uncharacteristic aggressiveness in comparison to the endless student demonstrations, sit-ins, and occupations over many decades since the 1960s, as well as the general police under-reaction to the George Floyd riots.
Here, they are correct. The sending of law enforcement into public and private universities to quickly clear out the “occupied zones” on public or private property is a reaction unseen in years, at least not since the 1960s student demonstrations. This is obviously due to jewish political power which supported those similar student radicals in years past and, obviously, black criminals and rioters.
But the supporters of the student demonstrations then go on to claim that there is some grand excessive use of bloody force against the students. That is just not true.
First and foremost, it is true that these protesters are being treated differently because of their protest message, which obviously is impacted by the Constitution. While private universities can discriminate based on viewpoint, sort of, as those universities are all contractors with and recipients of Federal, State, and local funding and bound by the Constitution as contractors and recipients of aid.
Public universities cannot discriminate when they enforce rules. However, we all know why these particular demonstrators are getting the wood shampoo from the police; jewish political power in the United States wanted those demonstrations silenced forthwith.
If the demonstrators had been White nationalists or even cuckservatives, they would have been chased off campus by the same students or just summarily removed by the campus administrators using the police, as has happened so often in the last 10 years or so. Who can forget the Battle of Berkeley, Saint Ann of Coulter, Peace Be Upon Her cancelled Berkeley speech, and other non-leftist speakers have been literally chased off campus with violence, not by the police, but by Antifa and other student terrorists, including Palestinians groups. Obviously this happened with the blessing of ZOG and its coalition of the fringes, which included Palestinians, who did their loyal service to the regime when opposing Whites was on the table.
The complaint from some remains that the force has been excessive or not. It has not. There have been may claims that excessive force was used against “peaceful protestors,” especially, for example, about Governor Greg Abbott’s ordering of arrests on the University of Texas, Austin, campus. Here there was misconduct by the government: Governor Abbott explicitly stated that the arrests were for “anti-semitism,” which is not a crime in Texas, nor anywhere in the United States, at the moment.
Arrests being made right now & will continue until the crowd disperses.
These protesters belong in jail.
Antisemitism will not be tolerated in Texas. Period.
Students joining in hate-filled, antisemitic protests at any public college or university in Texas should be expelled. https://t.co/XhLlQdvUl0
This obvious illegal, the police cannot arrest demonstrators based on the content of legal speech, and for that reason the local Soros District Attorney in Travis County dropped all the charges.
However, peaceful or not, legally, the police can arrest protestors if they are violating the law. There is no “peaceful” exception to violating the law. In these incidents, charges are generally related to trespassing, disturbing the peace, or violating time and place rules on demonstrations, such as camping out as part of the protest or occupying university buildings. One may not like it, but those are valid reasons for arrest; during arrests, force can and will be used. And, yes, the underlying reason for the arrests was the content of the speech. Any other speech would have been allowed and the demonstrations ignored, but the rulers decided for arrests. But the underlying arrests, absent the illegal motivation, were legal.
The claims of excessive force were also common and some are even predicting that protestors will be shot dead eventually. That is unlikely. But there is an over-reaction to all the videos of police laying on of the hands and making the habeas grabus. The critics are inaccurately conflating being dragged out of a group or a knee on the back while being handcuffed with some sort of abuse.
Here is one of their examples of excessive force:
Incredible scene here at UT as 50 or so protesters cower together in the center as DPS pulls them from the pack to detain them one by one pic.twitter.com/xjJsLbFgWI
What the critics are doing is conflating what their policy choice would have been, do nothing, with ZOG’s reaction to the message of the demonstrators, with claims of excessive force. There is no excessive force here. It is though a common rhetorical technique to exaggerate and misrepresent the actions of the police for political purposes, including here:
For instance, it is not excessive force to gain compliance of an arrestee with pepper spray.
STUDENTS IN AUSTIN ARE BEING HIT WITH PEPPER SPRAY AS THEY ARE ATTACKED BY POLICE pic.twitter.com/OYi7YKS1dT
Nor is being tackled on a lawn excessive by any definition of the law.
Slowed-down video highlights the moment a Georgia state trooper tackled a militant pro-Gaza protester at @EmoryUniversity. The university said those who mobilized there for the occupation are not students. The arrests have infuriated the far left. pic.twitter.com/j7kTejTJGz
Rest Assured, No Demonstrator Was Injured In The Making Of This Video
The many claims of excessive force are all false and mostly based on a disgust with the decisions of ZOG to act against the protestors because of their message, but also based on a lack of knowledge on the legality of the levels of force in these situations. They are even reaching back to the old “kettling” allegations from the 1960s. This goes back to the good old days when the Blue Meanies (Alameda County Sheriff’s Office (ACSO) and the ChiPs (California Highway Patrol), along with the Berkeley Police Department (BPD) and Oakland Police Department (OPD), were cracking skulls on the University of California, Berkeley campus during the Vietnam riots.
Kettling, when illegal, is when police legally order a crowd to disperse, but then do not provide a path to disperse. When legal, it is when the police legally order a crowd to disperse, but the crowd fails to disperse, then the police surround the now illegal demonstration or riot and proceed to make arrests.
Many on the right are claiming such incidents happened on campuses recently, though no video evidence has been presented showing an illegal use of kettling. The false charge of illegal kettling is just an excuse to attack the police for their legal actions. In all the cases I reviewed on video, the protestors were asked, then ordered to leave, did not then leave, were surrounded and arrested.
It is better to just say the actions of the police were politically motivated by jewish power, rather than make false allegations of excessive force. Obviously claiming excessive force is more emotionally appealing, but ultimately dishonest. You can do better. As one on that side has said, dissidents have an obligation to be honest, as that is all the power that they have. Be dishonest, and you lose that power.
The are other dishonest variations on the theme of illegal actions by the police, the most cited case is the Emory University professor who was arrested when she interfered in the arrest of a demonstrator. The law in all States is clear, no person may interfere in an arrest; it’s black letter law. Blacks, of course, do this all the time when they see a fellow black being arrested.
Blacks Inferring With An Arrest
As blacks are not allowed to “de-arrest” someone, college professors are similarly not allowed to interfere with an arrest, even of a student, even if the professor thinks that is an unlawful arrest or they know the student and can attest to their good character. Remember kids, the place to fight an illegal arrest is in court.
This isn’t CHINA..🇨🇳 This is AMERICA..🇺🇸
Emory Professor, Caroline Fohlin is violently arrested by police at her workplace…
The reality is that the professor publicly admitted she attacked the police officer. She wasn’t just trying to stop an unlawful arrest or “de-escalate” the situation. You can’t even lightly hit a police officer on the head while he is making an arrest.
Here’s that Professor of Economics who was arrested at Emory university and everyone seems to think is some poor victim of police repression. Caroline Fohlin ADMITS she hit a police officer on the head. Even professors are not allowed to assault cops. Yes, even professors. pic.twitter.com/YK5TrZokPD
Interfering with an arrest will get you thrown on the ground. And throwing a professor on the ground is not an excessive use of force. Her only injury was to her dignity. Of note is that this professor did not speak up for the Charlottesville protestors, so why the rush to attack the police? There is no reciprocity here. ZOG isn’t threatened if White Nationalists plead for some coalition with Palestinians or student protestors, both would follow orders as ZOG janissaries. Some are using the bromide, the enemy of my enemy is my friend, but that does not work if the enemy of my enemy is acting as my enemy as well.
Compared to the police response in the 60s when the batons and bayonets came out, things are quite easy for the protesters. Back then blood and teeth were lost. Here the protesters only get a Brazilian Jujitsu (BJJ) leg pull, which collapsed their drum circle like a house of cards.
Real Protestors Meet A Real Response From The Real National Guard
BPD Issuing A Wood Shampoo To More Manly Protesters
Back in the day, the primarily White male protesters could take a beating and fight back, you can give them that. But they weren’t pussies who would cry about a BJJ leg sweep or a arm-bar take-down. Protesters and their apologists today just don’t have the chops of yesteryear.
The solution to the current problem of jewish power over our society and nation though is not false narratives about police abuse, but leaning into the inherent contradictions of the jewish power structure, which relies on janissaries that are revolting, in more ways than one.
Some on the right think that Whites should support the protesters. However, that will not result in more protests, but less. The lazy protesters will be satisfied with divestment promises and university statements of support for the Palestinians.
#BREAKING: Portland State University has decided to pause its financial relationship with Boeing, caving to the demands of pro-Gaza activists
Protesters Win In Portland, Will They Expand Or Be Satisfied
Instead, I propose heightening the internal contradictions between the jews and their janissaries. Go harder with arrests. This will radicalize the janissaries and cause greater conflict with the jews, especially as they realize who really holds the power in the United States.
Some in favor of the demonstrators describe the similar problem the jews have with regard to the upcoming operation against Rafah. The jews want more Palestinian blood and some correctly recognizes that further bloodshed will cause bad public relations and collapse of the support for Israel. Cracking down harder on the trannys, homosexuals, Indians, and Palestinian demonstrators would do the same; radicalizing the protesters and emphasizing the growing fault lines in the jewish coalition of the fringes. Now is the time to accelerate the fracturing the jewish run operation encouraging disaffection in the ranks of the the janissaries.
Also of import is that those who support the demonstrators don’t realize that the American people instinctively hate the protesters. No one likes these aliens in our midst. No one likes trannies, homosexuals, immigrants, or even their masters, the jews.
Those who support the demonstrators are too much the intellectuals looking for grand theories and developing illusionary coalitions with blood enemies. They are looking for reasons to not support the natural prejudices of the majority of White Americans against their alien rulers and janissaries.
We can agree on the target, ZOG and their janissaries. It is just that pandering to one particular janissary group, student demonstrators or Palestinians, has no upside for White America. What is good for White America is the fracturing of ZOG coalition and escalating conflict within that coalition. They also seem to have forgotten that the police and the use of force are merely a tool of power. The real question is who will do what to whom. They might want to have the power of the police someday. Just remember, the German police were arresting National Socialists one day, then an election happened and the situation was reversed.
One Day Ago He Arrested Him, Now He’s A Comrade
What a difference a day makes.
Chose your side, White Man!
A counter-protester jumps up and down and hoots like a monkey toward a protester who was live-streaming on her phone at @OleMiss today.
Since the creation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in 2002, one of the enforcement components was none too happy to be part of an agency that had an immigration law responsibility. This component was first called the Bureau of Investigations and Criminal Enforcement, then the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), later renamed to U.S. ICE, now just ICE. ICE was subdivided into two enforcement sub-components originally called the Office of Investigations (OI), the investigative arm of ICE, and the Office of Detention and Removal Operations (DRO), the detention and deportation arm of ICE. Some years later, OI became Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and DRO became Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO).
OI/HSI was the combined and rebranded legacy Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) OI and U.S. Customs Service (USCS) OI, essentially the offices of the INS and USCS that conducted criminal investigations of violations of federal statutes dealing with immigration law and customs law respectively, staffed by Special Agents, the title of most Federal employees in the Criminal Investigator 1811 Series of employment classification. There was a great rivalry between the two, with the legacy USCS having a slight edge in prestige, as their journeyman pay grade was GS-13, while the legacy INS journeyman pay grade was GS-12. Eventually after the creation of OI/HSI, those legacy INS Special Agents were promoted to GS-13 at the journeyman level, but also lost their representation by a union.
The DRO/ERO was the former legacy INS Office of Detention and Deportation (DDP), which actually physically removed aliens from the United States.
In the ICE SVU flight from immigration enforcement, it has taken another step, it no longer wants to be part of ICE, but since it cannot leave ICE technically and legally, it will leave ICE in its own mind. (h/t reader W.R. Flynn)
“This is a big step forward,” the acting director said …
But HSI has long been familiar to those who track immigration-related law enforcement for its ties to its parent agency, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which is something that HSI is now trying to change.
The agency on Tuesday is going through a rebrand, changing their website from being associated with ICE to just HSI.gov.
That reflects an intentional push to distance HSI’s work from immigration policy, which has increasingly fueled Democratic attacks on ICE and led some cities, counties and states to enact so-called “sanctuary” policies to prevent cooperation with ICE officials related to a suspect’s immigration status.
So, instead of fulfilling their statutory authority to enforce immigration laws, ICE SVU complains that their ability to perform their duties was impacted by their name. The reality was that they did not want to perform their statutory duties, enforcing Title 8 of the United States Code, the criminal and administrative provisions of immigration law, such as alien smuggling.
“So many of our stakeholders are our law enforcement partners, the American public, private sector partners, NGOs — [they] are often confused about what we do, and the civil immigration enforcement side of the ICE mission is not what HSI does,” HSI Executive Associate Director Katrina Berger told ABC News in an interview.
That is a flagrant lie by Berger. One of the primary responsibilities of ICE SVU are the criminal and administrative law violations by illegal aliens in the United States. Illegal aliens, by their mere presence, are violating the law, which ICE SVU is charged with identifying and arresting any illegal alien in the United States. Two, other important provisions of criminal and administrative immigration law enforcement are assigned to ICE SVU, such as work-site enforcement and investigation of criminal fraud in immigration benefits. Those aspects of immigration law enforcement have both criminal and administrative functions; criminal in prosecuting illegal aliens for illegal employment, using fraudulent documents in employment, and criminal fraud in obtaining immigration benefits, administrative in making arrests and turning illegals over to ERO.
So, to appease illegal sanctuary jurisdictions, ICE SVU will now only be SVU.
“Having a being branded as ICE, having an ICE email address, we’re oftentimes not able to partner with law enforcement in certain jurisdictions that aren’t working with ICE, oftentimes college campuses, schools,” Berger said.
Instead of charging ahead and executing their duties, ICE SVU was cowering in the corner because some other random agency would not work with it. Did ICE SVU need permission from local police departments or cities that were sanctuaries or was it a Federal agency that could go where it wanted and do what it wanted? The legacy INS did, the FBI does, why is Berger so concerned about being popular with the cool kids? Partly because she’s a woman and women need social approval for what they do. But mostly because this is just part of another Biden Regime Administrative Amnesty, the we won’t enforce the immigration laws of the United States inside the United States amnesty.
The rebrand is a better opportunity for HSI to inform the public about what they do — and keep criminals off the streets, Berger said.
HSI’s mission is broad, officials note, from preventing terrorists from entering the country to identifying and supporting victims that are rescued from child exploitation situations to stopping financial fraud and the flow of counterfeit goods.
“We focus on our mission which is the global investigation of transnational crime impacting or our communities, and that really gets lost out there,” Berger said. “We are a criminal law enforcement agency.”
It was a trope on the internet that the Motor Vessel (MV) Dali which destroyed the Francis Scott Key Bridge, soon to be renamed after an obscure black politico, was destroyed by diversity. It wasn’t long before the news that the MV Dali was crewed by Indians, later identified as Sri Lankans, that genetically based low intelligence caused the crash. Sri Lanka has a national average Intelligence Quotient (IQ) of 86, so just by that standard, no vessel crewed and officered by Sri Lankans should be allow in any port in the United States, the risk of accident is just too high. One of the key aspects is the fact that the vessel was officered by non-Whites.
Diversity strikes was the theme on X, and rightly so.
Francis Scott Key bridge in Baltimore has collapsed after it was hit by a ship. Get used to more of this as standards across all industries are lowered in the name of diversity. pic.twitter.com/LwLjXqcttU
I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess there was some diversity involved somewhere in this mess at the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore pic.twitter.com/2sQrbzca92
Is this why the Francis Scott Key bridge disaster occured?
Instead of appointing a port commissioner based on competency, the Governor appointed a profession "diversity, equity, and inclusion consultant." pic.twitter.com/C5jNG9VJat
This Diversity Hire Was Not The Cause, But Still A Symptom
One would think that the race realists in Singapore would know better than to do diversity hiring, but it could be that they just wanted to use Sri Lankans to save money on salaries.
The company operating the ship which destroyed the Key Bridge in Baltimore was the Singaporean company Synergy Marine Group. They recently celebrated their "Diversity@Sea"project which aimed for "more inclusive seafaring." DIE at sea, indeed! https://t.co/RvF4Sdm97s
It was well into the 60s when Third World crews, but not officers, began to dominate international shipping, but well into the 1990s, during my experience in inspecting vessels arriving in the those vessels for the legacy Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) were still being officered primarily by Whites or East Asians. The Whites were primarily Norwegian, German, Poles, and Russians. American merchant mariners and officers were few and far between on international routes, which was part of a radical decline in the numbers of Americans who went to sea on merchant vessels. During the 1990s, the primary crew members were Filipinos, by far the largest number of mariners, followed by Hong Kongers, Mainland Chinese, and Taiwanese. European and American lines preferred Filipinos because of their availability, sufficient intelligence, diligence to master non-officer positions, and, most importantly, their English language skills. East Asian lines preferred Taiwanese, Hong Kongers, and Mainland Chinese because, well, Chinese was the lingua franca of most shipping lines which were dominated by Hong Kong and Taiwanese shipping lines. Interestingly, Japanese lines used Japanese officers, not surprisingly, but also preferred Filipino crew when they could not attract Japanese for non-officer positions. In the end, crew costs were the prime motivation to go with seamen from poor nations, but it was also true that crew positions were hard to fill with Whites or Japanese, with officer positions being easier to fill based on pay and prestige.
Now though, non-Whites dominate the officer corps as well as the regular crew; Indian, Sri Lankan, etc. now dominate all positions on commercial vessels, with the predictable results.
Diversity in science, technology, and engineering does kill, as it does also with complex and dangerous professions, as with going to sea and interacting with bridges, so common sense says that affirmative action or lowest common denominator should not be a factor in designing bridges or operating ocean going vessels.
We know now, and knew then, that the MV Dali lost power, causing it to collide with the bridge.
MV Dali Strikes The Francis Scott Key Bridge
The reason why the ship lost power is the important question. Usually such vessels have up to four diesel generators in addition to its main engines, with the generators used to power the vessel, especially if the the main engines are off, usually when in port, but are generally on-line even when under power to provide emergency power for lights and steering should main power be lost while under way. (At 4:00 in the below video)
Primer On Ships Power
It appears the likely reason the crash was that the MV Dali’s low IQ master did not have his generators on-line while exiting the harbor. There is no excuse for that, but an explanation is that the master was under orders from the owners to save money somehow, and the master decided that one of the ways he would save money would be on diesel fuel by not running the generators while underway.
That is obviously a bad call, a very bad call, but understandable if one is at the low end of the Bell Curve. Just the same as when you let women design a bridge. Collision and collapse is what you get.
After memes about how diversity kills conquered the internet, Joy Reid, the anti-White racist moron at MSNBC, she of the culturally appropriated blonde hair, took the issue on to claim that instead of being the cause, diversity was the victim of the disaster and low IQ non-Whites had nothing to do with the disaster.
World Ends, Women And Minorities Hardest Hit
In the meantime, Reid and Baltimore’s black racist Mayor also decided to threaten Whites with violence for criticizing the impact of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) on life and limb of residents of the Baltimore area.
Anti-White Racist Violence Threats From Blacks
However, Mayor Brandon Scott has changed his tune. In an effort to extort more money from the ship owners and their insurers, he has filed a lawsuit claiming that the MV Dali was being operated in a grossly incompetent manner. Basically, blacks are declaring war on the black skinned denizens of Sri Lanka.
Sri Lankans, Darker Than Joy Reid
The city said the companies’ effort to limit responsibility for the vessel and the cargo’s value to $43.6 million is “substantially less than the amount that will be claimed for losses and damages” arising out of the Dali’s collision with the Key Bridge.
In response to the vessel owners’ petition filed in U.S. District Court this month seeking to limit their liability, Mayor Brandon Scott and the Baltimore City Council argued Grace Ocean Private Ltd. and Synergy Marine Pte Ltd. “put a clearly unseaworthy vessel into the water,” and they called the companies’ actions “grossly and potentially criminally negligent …”
“None of this should have happened,” the city said in court filings. “Reporting has indicated that, even before leaving port, alarms showing an inconsistent power supply on the Dali had sounded. The Dali left port anyway, despite its clearly unseaworthy condition.”
And it gets more specific, amounting to an accusation that the collision was caused by incompetent non-Whites.
The court filings also take aim at the ship’s crew members, accusing the company of staffing the Dali with an “incompetent” crew that lacked proper skill or training, “was inattentive to its duties” and “failed to comply with local navigation customs.”
So, will Joy Reid apologize to Whites? Will the racist Mayor? Obviously not, but at least the meme lords were vindicated. Disasters follow diversity like Death himself.
Everyone on the internet pretends to be an expert on immigration law, policy, and procedure, including the financial fraudsters posing as experts on everything aside from immigration, like the notorious Brian Krassenstein. [Chutzpah, The Jewish Response To The Border Crisis, by Federale, Federale Blog, October 2, 2023 and Chutzpah: Is Brian Krassenstein A Liar Or A Moron, Either One, It’s Flagrant, by Federale, Federale Blog, December 6, 2023] Krassenstein knows nothing about immigration policy, procedure, or law, nor does the science writer at Snopes, Alex Kasprak. That is besides the lousy reasoning and tortured logic he uses in an effort to debunk an article about the ongoing Parole Amnesty that the Biden Regime is using to flood the United States with illegal aliens from Todd Bensman and the Center For Immigration Studies (CIS). It should be noted that Kasprak came to Snopes from clickbait BuzzFeed. His closest association with the government was working as a “science communicator” at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), National Aeronautics And Space Administration (NASA). There is, of course, no basis for immigration law and policy knowledge in those positions.
Alex Kasprak, Lying Press, Journalist
The article is written in the typical BuzzFeed clickbait style, with lots of short sentences and bullet points, frequent speculation, lies, and misdirection, but very light on the facts, despite links, most of which contradict the claims in the story. Links are important for Snopes’ work on fact checking, as it gives the appearance of research, but Snopes knows that it is guaranteed that no one follows the links that supposedly prove the point at hand.
The fraudulent fact checking also relies on the reader knowing nothing about immigration law, policy, or procedure. The Jesuits were commonly accused of lying by omission, for Snopes the lying is by chutzpah, just assuming no one will check the notes or links, unless you have access to an experienced immigration officer with the knowledge to disrupt the lies from the fact-checkers.
And that is just what this piece is, lies with an open-borders agenda, replete with the allegations of hate. Apparently checking up on a secret government program bringing in hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens is hate. This is the go-to for BuzzFeed-level journalism.
In early April 2024, critics of U.S. President Joe Biden accused his administration of flying “33,000 illegal immigrants” straight to New York City. The accusation stemmed from an April 8, 2024, opinion piece in the New York Post authored by the anti-immigration Center for Immigration Studies …
The Southern Poverty Law Center has classified CIS as a hate group.
Besides the lying innuendo about hate, it does not start off very well, Kasprak’s knowledge of the immigration programs at the core of the story appears to be close to zero, and the whole exercise is politically motivated shameless baby waving, asylum version. This is all about asylum-seekers.
The Biden-sponsored program at issue involves an “advanced travel authorization” (ATA) process for asylum-seekers from certain nations, allowing them to apply for asylum from abroad and then fly to America for a period of no more than two years while they wait for an immigration-court decision. CIS generated viral headlines with an earlier report that Snopes covered in March 2024, which asserted that this program was “secretive” because the government would not tell the CIS which domestic airports the migrants were using.
Here he commits several errors, first, ATA is the technical process by which certain aliens are given authorization to travel, not the program bringing the illegal aliens to the United States. The two are separate and distinct aspects of immigration policy and procedure. The programs are various parole programs, ATA is how the alien obtains entry to the United States, not the legal basis for entering.
What Kasprak does not know is that an alien outside the United States who is of a humanitarian interest to the United States and is the victim of persecution is not eligible for parole or asylum, but for refugee status. If that alien is outside the United States, that alien is a refugee or an applicant for refugee status. In fact, it is prohibited by law to use parole as a substitute for a refugee application. [Biden Regime Admits They Are Violating The Law By Paroling Refugees, by Federale, Federale Blog, September 29, 2023]
The third error is the claim that the aliens actually paroled are asylum-seekers. Kasprak not only fails to support that claim, but the claim is false. While the border is overrun with those making fraudulent asylum claims in order to be released, the actual numbers of those released or paroled in lieu of an asylum claim, are much smaller than those who gain entry to the United States, meaning most claiming asylum at the border and released, do not follow through with an asylum claim.
For example, the killer of Laken Riley, Jose Ibarra. Ibarra was detained at the border and paroled into the United States, as there was no detention space and processing for a hearing before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) was taking too long given the record numbers of illegal aliens that were attracted by the Biden Open Borders. However, Ibarra never reported to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office as required by the conditions of his parole. Ibarra also never appeared at a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to make an asylum application. [Laken Riley Murder Suspect Had Been Released Over Lack Of Detention Space, by Stephen Dinan, Washington Times, April 18, 2024]
Similarly, those paroled as part of the parole programs for Haitians, Venezuelans, Cubans, Nicaraguans, Colombians, Salvadorans, Ecuadorans, Guatemalans, and Hondurans are not submitting asylum claims, mostly because asylum-seeking is not part of those parole programs, but others released at the border on parole are not appearing at ICE offices, nor are those aliens who were arrested, processed, and released, for removal proceeding at the EOIR appearing at their scheduled hearing dates to pursue any asylum claim they made when arrested at the border. [The Massive Spike in Immigration Court ‘No-Shows’, by Andrew Arthur, CIS, February 2, 2024]
Our science fact-checker even gives the links to the USCIS internet pages for the parole programs for the above aliens. However, Kasprak did not appear to read the webpages that described the parole programs for Haitians, Venezuelans, Cubans, Nicaraguans, Colombians, Salvadorans, Ecuadorans, Guatemalans, and Hondurans.
The program for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans (CHNV), it does not include any mention of asylum or asylum-seekers except with regards to applying for employment authorization. Under eligibility, there is no mention of asylum.
A national of Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, or Venezuela (or their immediate family member of any nationality) who is outside the United States and who may be considered for parole under these processes.
Another link that Kasprak failed to read is this description of the parole program for Columbians, Salvadorans, Guatemalans, and Hondurans. That program is not for asylum-seekers, but those seeking family reunification.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) today announced the implementation of new family reunification parole (FRP) processes for Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras, advancing the Biden-Harris Administration’s successful combination of expanded lawful pathways and strengthened enforcement to reduce irregular migration. The FRP processes promote family unity and are part of the comprehensive measures announced in April by DHS and the Department of State.
The new processes are for nationals from Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras whose family members are U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents and who have received approval to join their family in the United States. Specifically, nationals of these countries can be considered for parole on a case-by-case basis for a period of up to three years while they wait to apply to become a lawful permanent resident.
Of import is that this Parole Amnesty specifically states that those participating in the program are intending immigrants, who under the law are required to have immigrant visas, not parole, to enter the United States.
According to section 212(a)(7)(A)(i) of the United States Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), any immigrant who, at the time of application for admission:
is not in possession of a valid unexpired immigrant visa, reentry permit, border crossing identification card, or other valid entry document required by the Immigration and Nationality Act, and a valid unexpired passport, or other suitable travel document, or document of identity and nationality if such document is required under the INS regulations, or whose visa has been issued without compliance with the provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act is excludable [from the United States].
For the final nail in Kraspak’s research bona fides, he failed to read the parole policy for Ecuadorans, where there is no mention of asylum-seekers, but for family reunification. We even get a new acronym, Family Reunification Parole (FRP). I guess science communicator Kasprak just missed that.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) today announced a Federal Register notice implementing a new family reunification parole (FRP) process for Ecuador, advancing the Biden-Harris Administration’s successful combination of expanded lawful pathways and strengthened enforcement to reduce irregular migration. The FRP processes promote family unity and are one of the comprehensive measures announced in April to promote safe and orderly migratory pathways, consistent with the objectives in the Los Angeles Declaration on Migration and Protection.
The new FRP process is by invitation only for certain nationals of Ecuador and allows an eligible beneficiary to be considered for parole into the United States on a case-by-case basis while they wait for their family-based immigrant visa to become available. This process is intended to reunite families more quickly and provide an alternative to dangerous irregular migration.
Note also that USCIS runs two separate parole programs for FRP for Haitians and Cubans, The Haitian Family Reunification Parole (HFRP) Program and The Cuban Family Reunification Parole Program (for some reason no acronym for the Cubans). But despite those programs, the CHNV Parole Program make no mention of “asylum-seeking.” So, what we clearly have is that Kasprak wants to cloak the numbers game he is playing with the cover of asylum, making anyone who discusses the program to be against “asylum-seekers.”
Then Kasprak confuses an affirmative asylum claim with a defensive asylum claim.
This process, known as the affirmative asylum process, usually results in the initial denial of an applicant’s request for asylum. They can appeal that decision to an immigration court. And while pursuing that appeal, if the individual submits biometric information and passes a criminal background check, they are released with a “notice-to-appear” document and can legally reside in the U.S. “on parole” for up to a year while their case is pending. Abbott’s program provides free bus rides to any such individual, paid for by Texas.
That is incorrect. An affirmative asylum claim is an application submitted to the Asylum Office of USCIS, a defensive asylum claim is that raised in removal proceedings either during Expedited Removal or before an Immigration Judge of the EOIR. Again, Kasprak did not bother to read the link he provided in his story. The process is that an alien is arrested, that alien claims asylum or credible fear of persecution if deported, then the alien is served with a DHS Form I-862, Notice To Appear (NTA) before the EOIR. An alien served with an NTA is not paroled, the alien in question may be released with either a bond or personal assurance of appearance at the EOIR hearing. That is not parole.
Kasprak appears to be confused, because he knows nothing about immigration law or procedure and made no effort to learn anything about immigration law and procedure. Kasprak confuses aliens who were detained at the border, but not formally arrested, but released on parole with a DHS Form I-385, Notice To Report (NTR) to the onward ICE office nearest to the alien’s intended place of residence, with aliens who were served with an NTA at the EOIR. More bad journalism by a journalist who knows nothing, but has an agenda.
Besides getting the basics wrong about the Parole Amnesty, Kasprak then becomes pedantic, arguing ad nauseam about how many arrivals at John F Kennedy International Airport (JFK) in New York City intended to stay in New York.
Snopes reached out to CIS to ask what basis it had for assuming most of the New York City (NYC) arrivals would stay put in the city and not travel domestically.
Why would Snopes care? And why would Kasprak have any basis to conclude that someone flying to JFK would not be most likely intending to go to NYC? Snopes and Kasprak care because they have an agenda. They want to blame the illegal alien crisis currently playing out in NYC on Governor Greg Abbott.
But ask yourself, why would anyone fly to JFK from South and Central America in order to fly onward to some other American city? JFK is the busiest northernmost international airport in the United States. It is out of the way in the northeast United States. There are bigger international airports in the United States more centrally located and much closer to South and Central America than JFK, with Atlanta International Airport being closer by a thousand or more miles than JFK, and is the busiest airport in the United States, with nation-wide connections. Anyone seeking connecting flights in the United States from Central or South America would likely go to Atlanta, Houston, Dallas, and Miami than JFK. It is logical to assume that any alien flying to NYC from South and Central America would have the metro New York area as their final destination.
It is clear that Snopes and Kasprak want to see how many illegal aliens can be blamed on Governor Abbott, his 37,000 freedom riders to NYC are about the same as the 33,000 flown direct to NYC by the Biden Parole Amnesty. But both numbers pale in comparison to those illegal aliens arrested and released, or paroled at the border, who chose to go to NYC, with flights paid for either directly by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) or by Non-Profit Corporations (NPC) contracted by the Federal government. Over 189,000 illegal aliens have arrived in NYC since the Biden Regime opened the borders.
More than 189,000 migrants have arrived in the city since the Spring of 2022, with more than 64,000 in the city’s care according to City Hall.
More importantly, NYC is the destination of choice for illegal aliens because of the generous welfare benefits provided: free hotel rooms or shelter beds, free food, and free cash cards, why wouldn’t illegal aliens go to NYC?
In the end, many illegal aliens got off their buses on the way to NYC, so the real numbers for either direct flights or Texas buses are impossible to know. We do know that NYC is a top welfare provider to illegal aliens. They are getting nothing in Florida, so the numbers of Biden Parole Amnesty illegal aliens could be even larger as those who make their first stop in Miami, then board flights to NYC. The NYC-MIA flight corridor is a shuttle service with dozens of flights per day. It is certainly lax journalism for Kasprak to not take this into consideration, especially as he is given to turning speculation into facts about some mass number of illegal aliens flying to NYC just to connect elsewhere.
Given the total number of illegal aliens in NYC, it is more likely that thousands flew onward from Miami to NYC than flew to NYC just to connect to somewhere else in the United States. Less likely because NYC is out of the way for connections to the wider United States.
But we do get a final lie, that that those with the Biden Parole Amnesty do not cost NYC or anyone else, as they have sponsors!
That means ATA recipients often arrive in the United States with a plan for where, or how, they’ll live. As for people who do make New York City their final stop, according to Langarica, they “will be there with the support of their sworn sponsor who has been previously vetted by USCIS as being capable of financially supporting the beneficiary, and they are eligible to apply for work authorization incident to the grant of parole.”
Well, no. For those who know immigration law, the sponsor requirement is not legally binding, as there is no statute authorizing the sponsor to support the illegal alien. As with the whole Parole Program, there is no statute that authorizes any conditions on parole, such as financial support. Even for legal immigrants who must have a sponsor who has signed DHS Form I-864, Affidavit of Support Under Section 213A of the INA, attesting to being liable for financial support for said legal immigrant, there has never been a legal case where the government attempted to obtain support payments for such a legal immigrant who became destitute and dependent on welfare. There is even a lesser chance that the government will be able to obtain such payments from a sponsor who is not required by law to make such payments.
Remember, All Journalists Are Bastards (AJAB), lying bastards, and you can’t hate them enough, and Alex Kasprak is among the worst of journalists.
You can’t hate journalists enough.
Not least because no matter how much you hate them, it pales to hue they hate you.
In case you were wondering why we haven’t seen more immigrant border stormings over the Texas defenses in El Paso, the reason they stopped l: pepper rounds fired into the mobs pic.twitter.com/4ODwKkUrDX
Texas Appears To Be Shooting Illegal Alien Invaders
It is not clear on the video that Texas National Guard and State Troopers are actually using less-than-lethal force; the weapons in the video appear to be 40 mm grenade launchers or perhaps pepper ball launchers. Generally the 40 mm launchers use less-than-lethal impact rounds-foam, rubber, or plastic rounds designed to stun the subject, with pepper ball launchers firing pellets of oleoresin capsicum designed to break on impact and disperse in powdered form.
It is uncertain how wide-spread this new evolution of tactics is at the border, we have only this one video and no story.
Hopefully more aggressive force is back on the menu.
Steve Sailer, he of many quips on the issues of the day, has one that is timeless, the Zeroth Amendment to the Constitution means unlimited and unobjectionable immigration to the United States. Like a recurring disease, the Zeroth Amendment, by Emma Lazarus, is back again, this time being used by historian Ana Raquel Minian Andjel to decry the detention of criminals and illegal aliens who crossed the border in violation of Federal law.
Granted, I'm not a Stanford professor of history, like Ana Raquel Minian writing in the New York Times, but even I know that the United States was not founded in 1776-88 on Emma Lazarus's 1883 poem The New Colossus.https://t.co/B4oXhHrraPpic.twitter.com/NhEvO7eu2s
Lazarus and Andjel, though one might think is of some Hispanic ancestry, in fact, is of the same ancestry as Lazarsus and has the same view of immigration, a nation busting exercise furthering the extinction of the White Historic American Nation. [Retconning the Founding, by Steve Sailer, The Unz Review, April 14, 2024]
Ana Raquel Minian Andjel
In fact, almost nobody ever quoted the now-iconic phrase "huddled masses yearning to breathe free" until the later 1930s. pic.twitter.com/N0TccptpYE
Huddled Masses Means Unlimited Non- White Immigration
However, it is even worse that Sailer observes, it is not just the Zeroth Amendment, it is the adoption by historians of strategy of lying to make their points. Maybe lots of White immigrants looked up America and the Statue of Liberty as an invitation of sorts, which one could argue is true. Many White immigrants entered the United States between the building of the Statue of Liberty and the beginning of immigration restrictions of the 1920s. It is almost laughable though that those wise men were concerned about too many of the wrong kind of immigrants, especially those of Lazarus’ and Andjel’s origins, but too many Slavs and Lebanese? If only that were the problem compared to today.
Andjel is the quintessential race hustler of limited intelligence and academic reach, her only issue appears to be the detention of illegal aliens, because she supports open borders. Perhaps Christopher Rufo should point his AI driven plagiarism detector at Miss Andjel. She’s an Associate Professor of History at Stanford University with only two books to her credit.
But one would think that a historian could get simple historical and legal facts correct. Instead we get someone lying like they were a paid up member of the Treason Bar. Are there not ethical rules that academics cannot lie in their work? Because Andjel repeats the same lie in her work on open borders, the lie that aliens may enter without inspection (EWI) by an immigration officer.
In May 2018, Fernando Arredondo and his 12-year-old daughter, Andrea, reached the U.S.-Mexico border. The two had fled Guatemala after gang members killed his son, Marco, and threatened the rest of the family.
Weeks earlier, the Trump administration had introduced the zero-tolerance policy: Adult migrants who were caught crossing the border without permission were to be prosecuted and imprisoned, and the children traveling with them taken away and detained separately.
Mr. Arredondo was not aware of the new policy, but it should not have mattered. He did not cross the border illegally. He and Andrea walked to a Border Patrol processing center in Laredo, Texas, and asked for asylum, a right guaranteed by U.S. law.
My first question is why is Miss Andjel using different versions of her name? At Stanford University she is know as Ana Raquel Minian Andjel and sometimes she is know there as just Ana Minian. At the NYT she is Ana Raquel Minian. Why the game with her names? Is she trying to hide something?
And Miss Andjel says the lie about EWI not being a crime more than once.
Even though he had not broken the law, he now found himself at the Rio Grande Detention Center, a holding facility for men that was run by the GEO Group, a private prison corporation.
So, that is twice that Miss Andjel lies to the public in her opinion piece. Certainly that is not within academic standards of behavior? It is an opinion piece, and she can have the opinion that it should not be a violation of criminal law to enter the United States without inspection or that aliens should not be detained for any reason. But that is quite different from repeatedly lying that it is not a crime to enter the United States without inspection, whether one turns oneself in or not, whether one subsequently makes a defensive claim of asylum in removal proceedings before the Executive Office For Immigration Review (EOIR), the administrative immigration court system or not.
The law is quite clear that crossing the border at a place not designated by the Attorney General by an alien is a criminal offense.
Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.
And these flagrant lies and unethical statements are not the only problem, besides the appeal to the Zeroth Amendment.
Arresting illegal aliens for the criminal offense of EWI, is not some new policy, though the enforcement of this statute on a more widespread basis was a change as generally it was only used against repeat offenders. Miss Andjel suggests that something strange or unusual happened when Fernando Arredondo was separated from his daughter upon his arrest for a criminal offense.
I am not so credulous to believe that Miss Andjel thinks that this is unusual. Does she believe that those arrested are not separated from family members? Does this alleged Associate Professor of History and expert on prisons, jails, and immigration detention, think that children are taken into custody when their parents are arrested in the United States? Every day thousands parents are separated from their children when arrested for criminal offenses. They are never allowed to take their children with them to either their initial court appearance or to the custodian facility when remanded.
Miss Andjel further lies when she claims that Senor Arredondo was not told what was happening. As a Federal law enforcement officer, I have arrested scores of people for criminal offenses and untold numbers for immigration offenses. I also have closely observed other officers making similar arrests for immigration and criminal offenses. In every occasion, the person arrested is informed in excruciating detail about what will be happening, especially if they brought a child with them or have children present at the time of arrest. For immigration arrests, they are informed that they will be separated from their minor children, as children are held separately from adults.
In the case of criminal arrests, they are informed about what will be happening as well: They are told that they are being arrested for a criminal offense, that they will be taken to appear before a judge, and may or may not be held in custody upon the decision of the judge. They are told that their children may not accompany them after arrest and that if they have no responsible adult to care for their minor children, the local authorities who care for minor children, the local Child Protective Services (CPS) agency, will be summoned and given custody of the minor children. Anyone who claims that Senor Arredondo was not told of what was happening to him and his child are either lying, repeating an obvious lie that was told to them, or just credulous.
Only one of those descriptions fits Miss Andjel. She is an activist and is lying to support her cause of open borders and the replacement of the Historic American Nation by non-White immigration by reliving the “children in cages” charge.
Miss Andjel then gives us not so much a lie, as a deliberate deception with a veneer of truth. She claims that asylum is a right.
” … and asked for asylum, a right guaranteed by U.S. law.’
Not quite a right. One does not just enter the United States and request asylum. One first makes a claim to an immigration officer that he or she fears persecution if returned to their country of origin and if that claim is credible, the alien is referred to an Asylum Officer for determination if the claim merits referral to the EOIR for removal proceedings. Of course, the substantial claim by Senor Arredondo was on its face legally insufficient, as being the victim of a crime is not persecution by the government of the alien’s citizenship or last place of habitual residence. But there is no right to asylum. A claim to asylum must be adjudicated by the EOIR in that case. And the claim to asylum is a defense against deportation, not a right.
Miss Andjel also lies about the Chinese Exclusion Act, claiming that Chinese were excluded from the United States by their race.
In 1882, Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Act, which barred Chinese labor immigrants from entering the country … Their race, rather than their actions, determined whether they spent time behind bars.
That is a lie. The Chinese were not excluded because of their race, but because of their nationality. The Chinese Exclusion Act did not apply to other Asians. Filipinos, Thais, Samoans, Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese, Indians, etc, were not included in the Chinese Exclusion Act. Why else did President Theodore Roosevelt have to negotiate the Gentleman’s Agreement with the Government of Japan to restrict Japanese immigration?
Such academic dishonesty is shocking. What academic standards does Stanford University have? Any standards at all?
Then Miss Andjel claims that the results of what happened to Senor Arredondo proves that he and his minor child were illegally detained.
Mr. Arredondo and Andrea now live in Los Angeles with the rest of their family. They were lucky; not only was the family reunited, but they have also been granted asylum. But he and his family deserved better. So do all those who are currently entrapped in our vast detention system. Immigrant detention should have no place in our society.
What shocks me is that any Immigration Judge would approve such a legally invalid claim to asylum. Being the victim of a crime is not the basis for asylum. This certainly brings into question the quality of Immigration Judges, but does not justify the fallacious and dishonest claim that crossing the border illegally is not a crime.
Nor is it any evidence that detaining aliens is somehow immoral. Nothing happened to Senor Arredondo. He received more than his due process of law. In fact, he successfully entered the United States illegally, received no punishment, and defrauded the United States with a fraudulent asylum claim. Furthermore he was not summarily deported under Expedited Removal given that his claim of being the victim of a crime did not reach the level of credible fear necessitating a referral to the EOIR. Instead of receiving asylum, Senor Arredondo and minor child should have been immediately deported.
The real question is, why are academics allowed to lie to the public with no repercussions? Does not Stanford University care anything for their reputation?
Notorious Chinese open-borders activist and kritarch Dolly Gee has struck again to aid illegal aliens. This time illegal aliens who have not been arrested yet must get food and shelter from the U.S. Border Patrol (USBP). The absurdity is self-evident, but the borders must be open and illegal aliens protected, all at the whim of an illegal alien booster in judges’ robes.
But nothing is ever settled for Kritarch Gee in her bid to open America’s borders. Now illegal aliens not even arrested are to get theClub Fed treatment:
Migrant children who wait in makeshift camps along the U.S.-Mexico border for the Border Patrol to process them are in the agency’s custody and are subject to a long-standing court-supervised agreement that set standards for their treatment, a judge ruled.
The issue of when the children are officially in Border Patrol custody is particularly important because of the 1997 court settlement on how migrant children in U.S. government custody must be treated. Those standards include a time limit on how long the children can be held and services such as toilets, sinks and temperature controls.
Wednesday’s ruling means the Department of Homeland Security must quickly process the children and place them in facilities that are “safe and sanitary.”
The border camps have become a flashpoint between immigrant advocates and the federal government. The U.S. has said smugglers send migrants to the camps and argued that the children are not yet in Border Patrol custody because they haven’t been arrested. Advocates say the U.S. government has a responsibility for the children and that Border Patrol often directs migrants to the camps, sometimes even driving them there.
The USBP has no responsibility for those who it has not arrested. In fact, the attractive nuisance of these camps, established by the advocacy groups themselves, who dish out food and legal advice, are those responsible for the hordes of illegals crossing the border and waiting to be arrested.
The illegal order, following previous illegal orders from Kritarch Gee, is an absurdity. It claims to be based on the law, but there is no law that states once an illegal alien arrives in the United States and plops down in the desert, that the illegal alien gets food and shelter.
“This is a tremendous victory for children at open air detention sites, but it remains a tragedy that a court had to direct the government to do what basic human decency and the law clearly require,” Neha Desai, senior director of immigration at the National Center for Youth Law, said in a statement.
It is typical that the open borders advocates cloak their claims in the law. But their appeal to the law is a lie. There is no law that says a criminal is arrested before he is arrested. The arrest comes first, then the responsibility to feed and shelter an arrestee. Just as there is no law that says families and unaccompanied minors are to be released from custody. It just is not there.
Time to impeach kritarchs like Dolly Gee. Or just ignore their unconstitutional decisions.
The Japanese have a love/hate relationship with gaijin, foreigners; the Japanese have always been fascinated with the other and the culture of the other. They also want to remain uniquely Japanese. Simply, this is for two reasons; one because Japan’s origin mythology does not take into account those who are not Japanese, nor are the others explained in that mythology. This is called close-universe origin mythology. Contrast this with other societies where origin mythologies such as Christianity where the world was created and then populated by numerous peoples. This is an open-universe origin mythology. The origin mythology of the West and Christendom accounts for both particular Westerners, other different kinds of Westerners, and outsiders.
Because the Japanese don’t see the outsider in their origin mythologies, it creates an outlook on the other that at times can be both hostile and welcoming. In Japan, the guest is always treated respectfully, but is always viewed as an outsider and subject to discipline if the outsider misbehaves or even by mere presence, is seen as a threat to the the social order.
The hostility inherent in Japanese society to the gaijin is balanced by the Japanese feeling of inferiority because of their cultural dependence on outsiders, specifically almost everything we see in Japan has a cultural origin in China and Korea. The Japanese are loath to admit this at times and at other times specifically cite foreign sources as authoritative for Japanese behavior and social organization. We see this in an adaptation that the Japanese make their own, such as their national dress, the robes of the yukata, kimono, and hakama. Few know that the quintessential Japanese clothing so known throughout the world is, in fact, directly descendant from the traditional and court clothing of T’ang Dynasty China.
More importantly, the most important religious duty of the Emperor of Japan, the ceremonial cultivation of the Imperial rice fields, is an imitation of the same religious ceremony conducted by the Chinese Emperor. The official ideology of the Tokugawa Shogunate was at the same time officially adopted Neo-Confucianism for the political organization of Japan and a policy of radical isolation from not just the West, but also from Korea and China.
Of course, what may be commonly thought of as Japanese, coming from elsewhere, has been made Japanese. Ramen, Chinese noodles, tempura, Portuguese deep frying, etc. For a people so unified racially, linguistically, and culturally, the Japanese are quite open to adopting from the outside and then making it Japanese.
However, recent events have come to test the Japanese openness to outsiders. Once know for their toleration of foreigners on the principle that any foibles of a visitor is just a gaijin who does not know any better, the Japanese are becoming concerned that there is an invasion of barbarians.
Therefore, as the Saxon began to hate, so too is the Samurai beginning to hate; sometimes because of boorish behavior, sometimes because of black and other criminals of color.
Visitors to the geisha district of Gion – one of Kyoto’s most popular sightseeing spots – will be banned from entering its picturesque alleyways as authorities in Japan attempt to tackle a dramatic rise in tourism.
Residents of Japan’s ancient capital have struggled to reconcile the financial boost from a return to pre-pandemic visitor numbers with overcrowding and incidents of bad behaviour among tourists.
This is certainly a reasonable reaction by the Japanese to rude behavior by tourists. And it seems to be a world-wide phenomenon with tourists behaving badly all over the world. The results of the dumbing-down of behavior, especially after Covid. [Swiss Tourist Filmed Carving Her Initials In Rome’s Colosseum, By David Mouriquand, Euronews, July 17, 2023]
But it is not just rude tourists, but invaders that are causing problems, and reaction, in Japan. Blacks are, of course, at the center of the problem, with Mountain Turks and Indians not far behind.
A North African migrant from Burkina Faso has been arrested in Fussa, Tokyo for stabbing a Japanese teenager to steal his wallet. pic.twitter.com/8xyRs1lZDQ
— 🇯🇵 Colonel Otaku Gatekeeper 🇯🇵 (@politicalawake) April 4, 2024
Kurdish people living in the Saitama Prefecture cities of Kawaguchi and Warabi in eastern Japan have been subjected to hate speech that began to escalate in 2023, it has emerged.
The abuse has included such phrases as “Get out,” “Cheers for the massacre,” and “Fake refugees.” Places with which Kurds are associated have also been hit with emails and phone calls demanding their exclusion from Japan. In February, a demonstration that included anti-foreign slogans was also held. One expert says that in just under a year, Kurdish people seem to have become fresh targets of hate speech.
Many foreigners live in Kawaguchi and Warabi. Kawaguchi, in particular, has a foreign population of around 40,000, the most of any municipality in the prefecture. Kurds started to arrive in around the late 1990s and, according to a support organization, Kurdish residents in the prefecture now number over 2,000, most of them from Turkey.
People have complained to authorities about local Kurds before, including over noise and obeying rules about taking out the garbage. It was from around the spring to summer of 2023 that hate directed at Kurds came out in force.
At the time, there had been protests by foreign residents about a revision to the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act that would allow Japan to deport foreigners after their third application for refugee status, and increased media exposure drew attention to Kurds, many of whom were seeking recognition as refugees.
And what happened in the West with Third World immigration is happening in Japan, the gaijin are isolating themselves, not learning Japanese, won’t behave, and drain the local taxpayers with demands for translators and assistance.
However, Kobayashi says not many of the resident foreigners reach out to build new connections with the Japanese. In numerous cases, the workers’ bosses at the business park are also foreign-born, so dialogue takes place in their native language. Viewing Japanese as unnecessary at work, many are not bothering to learn it. At the municipal offices and other situations, some parents rely on their children as interpreters, having picked up Japanese at school.
As a result, a great number reportedly live with only their foreign peers, forging their own communities more so than deepening ties with locals.
Aikawa has avoided treating foreign residents as special. Kobayashi said, ” If we give too much special support to foreigners, people will question, ‘what about the original residents?’ We do provide basic support, but from that point on we interact with them as ‘fellow residents.'”
👀 “Migrants have been led to believe if they disregard directives from OLS personnel and resort to increased levels of violence when breaching the fence line, they will not face consequences from US law enforcement…”
Terrorist Invaders Are Being Encouraged To Use Violence
All were armed with M-4 carbines, the standard issue shoulder arm of the U.S. Army and National Guard. However, instead of shooting their armed attackers, they allowed the attackers to threaten them with edged weapons. This shows a shocking lack of training and judgement. Almost all law enforcement agencies train their personnel to use deadly force when confronted with edged weapons, at least within 21 feet. This is commonly, though mistakenly referred to the Tueller Drill, but is more accurately called the Tueller Principle after Dennis Tueller, the police officer who researched reaction time of a police officer drawing and firing against an aggressive attacked by an assailant with an edged weapon.
The research showed that an attacker with an edged weapon can close the distance and use an edged or blunt impact weapon if the assailant is within 21 feet. Note that leftist police bureaucrats are discouraging shooting such subjects, wanting officers to risk death by using tasers and impact rounds instead of using deadly force.
The Tueller Principle
Clearly these Guardsmen should have been shooting immediately and not risked being stabbed to death. As a firearms instructor for my agency, I always insisted that agents I trained always shoot when confronted with an edged weapon and not to delay, as hesitation could result in death.
Note also that the Guardsmen would have been justified in shooting the illegal aliens even if they were unarmed, as the Guardsmen were outnumbered and easily could have been overwhelmed by sheer numbers. All the more reason to also issue bayonets and have those bayonets fixed in such situations. Also, consideration should be given to issuing M-16 variant rifles to the Guardsmen, as the M-16 and variants have 20″ barrels, while the M-4 carbine has only a 14.5″ barrel. Length is life in bayonet fighting.
I am concerned about this though, as Governor Abbott promised a pardon for a patriotic Texan who used deadly force in self-defense but was convicted anyway by a Soros District Attorney, but the pardon hasn’t come through. [Greg Abbott Faces Anniversary of Pardon Promise, by Katherine Fung, Newsweek, March 29, 2024]
But, while that problem can be solved with training and clear instructions from Governor Greg Abbott on down that deadly force is authorized in such cases, the other problem is that some of these armed illegal alien terrorists are being protected from arrest by unindicted visa fraudster Alejandro Mayorkas, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
Former Alien Protecting His Fellow Aliens
It appears that many of the illegal aliens who attacked the Guardsmen were later “arrested” by the Border Patrol, with some being transferred to U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement (ICE) Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO). Those currently in ERO custody, for no reason as ICE routinely releases such illegal aliens, are not being transferred to the custody of the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS), who are investigating and charging these terrorists with crimes. Those in Border Patrol custody were turned over to DPS.
Texas authorities have arrested 70 additional migrants on rioting charges related to the March 21 incident in which they overran and assaulted National Guard troops in an attempt to rush the border at El Paso, an official told The Post.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is holding more than 200 migrants whom the state wants to arrest and charge, but federal authorities “are not being as cooperative as Border Patrol,” according to the official.
The 70 who have been arrested face charges for misdemeanor rioting, the source said …
Authorities later confiscated knives and shanks from some of those involved in the riot, according to a National Guard source.
At least one migrant had also attempted to grab a soldier’s firearm during the incident.
Some of the soldiers near Gate 36 that day were transported to a nearby hospital for minor injuries.
Why has Mayorkas given orders to ICE ERO to protect these terrorists? Clearly, he wants these terrorists released into the United States eventually. But why protect these particular illegal aliens from criminal prosecution? Ideological commitment to illegal immigration? Sympathy of a one-time alien for other aliens? Revenge for the holocaust? Perhaps a Senator or Representative should as Mayorkas if he testifies at his impeachment trial, if Chuck Schumer allows his fellow Jewish-American to stand trial as required by the Constitution.
Federale 